Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34001579›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2021

Treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: experiences in a UK regional neurosciences Centre.

Joanna E Perthen, Paul J Dorman, Danny Morland, Nancy Redfern, David Ja Butteriss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanna E PerthenThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Joanna.Perthen@nhs.net.
Paul J DormanThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Danny MorlandThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Nancy RedfernThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
David Ja ButterissThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A robust treatment paradigm for spontaneous intracranial hypotension has yet to be agreed upon. We present retrospective data from the patient cohort at our UK regional neurosciences centre from 2010-2020 and describe our locally developed treatment pathway.Seventy-three patients were identified: 31 men and 42 women; mean age was 42 years. The majority presented with a headache of variable duration, and most had positive imaging. Very few patients (7%) responded to conservative treatment. Sixty-six underwent epidural blood patching, with 39 (59%) having a good response. Twenty-three patients underwent myelography and targeted treatment (injection of fibrin sealant at the leak site), with 13 (57%) showing a good response. One patient had successful surgery. The relapse rate after response to epidural blood patching was 10%, and after response to targeted treatment was 23%. Most patients who relapsed responded to repeated treatments.The outcome data for our diverse patient cohort shows the success of a staged approach to treatment. Relapse rates are low, and surgery is only rarely required. We use these data to inform our discussions with patients, and present them here to enable other centres to develop robust investigation and treatment paradigms of their own.

Indexed as

Intracranial HypotensionNeurosciencesAdultBlood Patch, EpiduralFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomCSF leakepidural blood patchmyelographypostural headachespontaneous intracranial hypotension

Identifiers

PMID34001579
PMCPMC8140691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.