Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34001519›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2021

Effects of a community-driven water, sanitation and hygiene intervention on water and sanitation infrastructure, access, behaviour, and governance: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Democratic Republic of Congo.

John Paul Quattrochi, Aidan Coville, Eric Mvukiyehe, Caleb Jeremie Dohou, Federica Esu, Byron Cohen, Yannick Lokaya Bokasola, Kevin Croke

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to improve sanitation for preventing diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John Paul QuattrochiPublic Health Department, Simmons University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA john.quattrochi@simmons.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-5931
Aidan CovilleDevelopment Impact Evaluation Department, World Bank Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Eric MvukiyeheDevelopment Impact Evaluation Department, World Bank Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Caleb Jeremie DohouDevelopment Impact Evaluation Department, The World Bank Group, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Federica EsuResearch, Assessment, and Monitoring Department, World Food Programme, Rome, Italy.
Byron CohenDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6356-7966
Yannick Lokaya BokasolaDevelopment Impact Evaluation Department, The World Bank Group, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Kevin CrokeDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4750-9280

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInadequate water and sanitation is a central challenge in global health. Since 2008, the Democratic Republic of Congo government has implemented a national programme, Healthy Villages and Schools (

methodsA cluster-level randomised controlled trial of VEA was implemented throughout 2019 across 332 rural villages, grouped into 50 treatment and 71 control clusters. Primary outcomes included time spent collecting water; quantity of water collected; prevalence of improved primary source of drinking water; and prevalence of improved primary defecation site. Secondary outcomes included child health, water governance, water satisfaction, handwashing practices, sanitation practices, financial cost of water, school attendance and water storage practices. All outcomes were self-reported. The primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, using linear models. Outcomes were measured October-December 2019, median 5 months post-intervention.

resultsThe programme increased access to improved water sources by 33 percentage points (pp) (95% CI 22 to 45), to improved sanitation facilities by 26 pp (95% CI 14 to 37), and improved water governance by 1.3 SDs (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5), water satisfaction by 0.6 SD (95% CI 0.4 to 0.9), handwashing practices by 0.5 SD (95% CI 0.3 to 0.7) and sanitation practices by 0.3 SD (95% CI 0.1 to 0.4). There was no significant difference in financial cost of water, school attendance, child health or water storage practices.

conclusionVEA produced large increases in access to and satisfaction with water and sanitation services, in self-reported hygiene and sanitation behaviour, and in measures of water governance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: AEARCTR-0004648; American Economic Association RCT registry.

Indexed as

SanitationWaterChildDemocratic Republic of the CongoDiarrheaHumansHygieneWaterenvironmental healthhealth policyhealth systemspublic healthrandomised control trial

Identifiers

PMID34001519
PMCPMC8130731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.