Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34001175›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2021

Defining the optimal temporal and spatial resolution for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking.

Sören J Backhaus, Georg Metschies, Marcus Billing, Jonas Schmidt-Rimpler, Johannes T Kowallick, Roman J Gertz, Tomas Lapinskas, Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher, Burkert Pieske, Joachim Lotz and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived left atrioventricular coupling index and major adverse cardiac events in patients following acute myocardial infarction.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Anterior STEMI associated with decreased strain in remote cardiac myocardium.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sören J BackhausDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2683-6418
Georg MetschiesDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Marcus BillingDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Jonas Schmidt-RimplerDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Johannes T KowallickGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Roman J GertzDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Tomas LapinskasGerman Heart Center Berlin (DHZB), Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany.
Elisabeth Pieske-KraigherGerman Heart Center Berlin (DHZB), Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany.
Burkert PieskeGerman Heart Center Berlin (DHZB), Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany.
Joachim LotzGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Boris BigalkeDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Shelby KuttyTaussig Heart Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Gerd HasenfußDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Sebastian Kelle *German Heart Center Berlin (DHZB), Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas Schuster *Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany. andreas_schuster@gmx.net.ORCID 0000-0003-1508-1125
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEJohns Hopkins Hospital · USLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyocardial deformation analyses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (CMR-FT) have incremental value in the assessment of cardiac function beyond volumetric analyses. Since guidelines do not recommend specific imaging parameters, we aimed to define optimal spatial and temporal resolutions for CMR cine images to enable reliable post-processing.

methodsIntra- and inter-observer reproducibility was assessed in 12 healthy subjects and 9 heart failure (HF) patients. Cine images were acquired with different temporal (20, 30, 40 and 50 frames/cardiac cycle) and spatial resolutions (high in-plane 1.5 × 1.5 mm through-plane 5 mm, standard 1.8 × 1.8 x 8mm and low 3.0 × 3.0 x 10mm). CMR-FT comprised left ventricular (LV) global and segmental longitudinal/circumferential strain (GLS/GCS) and associated systolic strain rates (SR), and right ventricular (RV) GLS.

resultsTemporal but not spatial resolution did impact absolute strain and SR. Maximum absolute changes between lowest and highest temporal resolution were as follows: 1.8% and 0.3%/s for LV GLS and SR, 2.5% and 0.6%/s for GCS and SR as well as 1.4% for RV GLS. Changes of strain values occurred comparing 20 and 30 frames/cardiac cycle including LV and RV GLS and GCS (p < 0.001-0.046). In contrast, SR values (LV GLS/GCS SR) changed significantly comparing all successive temporal resolutions (p < 0.001-0.013). LV strain and SR reproducibility was not affected by either temporal or spatial resolution, whilst RV strain variability decreased with augmentation of temporal resolution.

conclusionTemporal but not spatial resolution significantly affects strain and SR in CMR-FT deformation analyses. Strain analyses require lower temporal resolution and 30 frames/cardiac cycle offer consistent strain assessments, whilst SR measurements gain from further increases in temporal resolution.

Indexed as

Heart VentriclesMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsVentricular Function, LeftCardiovascular magnetic resonanceMyocardial deformationReproducibilitySpatial resolutionStrainTemporal resolution

Identifiers

PMID34001175
PMCPMC8127257
OpenAlexW3163898922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.