Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34001113›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2021

Self-admission in the treatment of eating disorders: an analysis of healthcare resource reallocation.

Mattias Strand, Cynthia M Bulik, Sanna A Gustafsson, Elisabeth Welch

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02937259 (Self-admission), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02937259 nacompletednot on this map

Self-admission: A New Treatment Approach for Patients With Severe Eating Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2014 to 2020Enrolled34ConditionsEating Disorders, Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia NervosaArmsPatient self-admission to inpatient treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brief user-controlled admission (BUCA) in psychiatric care.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mattias StrandCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. mattias.strand@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4799-0737
Cynthia M BulikDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sanna A GustafssonUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Elisabeth WelchCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

ALF Medicin (Karolinska Institutet/Stockholm County Council) n/aFredrik & Ingrid Thurings Stiftelse n/aKvinnor & Hälsa n/aPRIO (Stockholm County Council) n/aPsykiatrifonden n/aStiftelsen Krica n/aVärkstadsstiftelsen n/aVetenskapsrådet 538-2013-8864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-admission to psychiatric inpatient treatment is an innovative approach to healthcare rationing, based on reallocation of existing resources rather than on increased funding. In self-admission, patients with a history of high healthcare utilization are invited to decide for themselves when brief admission is warranted. Previous findings on patients with severe eating disorders indicate that self-admission reduces participants' need for inpatient treatment, but that it does not alone lead to symptom remission.

methodsThe aim of this study was to evaluate if, from a service provider perspective, the resource reallocation associated with self-admission is justified. The analysis makes use of data from a cohort study evaluating the one-year outcomes of self-admission at the Stockholm Centre for Eating Disorders.

resultsParticipants in the program reduced their need for regular specialist inpatient treatment by 67%. Thereby, hospital beds were made available for non-participants due to the removal of a yearly average of 13.2 high-utilizers from the regular waiting list. A sensitivity analysis showed that this "win-win situation" occurred within the entire 95% confidence interval of the inpatient treatment utilization reduction.

conclusionsFor healthcare systems relying on rationing by waiting list, self-admission has the potential to reduce the need for hospitalization for patients with longstanding eating disorders, while also offering benefits in the form of increased available resources for other patients requiring hospitalization.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02937259 (retrospectively registered 10/15/2016).

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersHospitalizationCohort StudiesDelivery of Health CareHumansInpatientsAnorexia nervosaDelivery of health careEconomicsHealth care rationingHealth resourcesVoluntary admission

Identifiers

PMID34001113
PMCPMC8130160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.