Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34001006›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

RcTGA1 and glucosinolate biosynthesis pathway involvement in the defence of rose against the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea.

Penghua Gao, Hao Zhang, Huijun Yan, Qigang Wang, Bo Yan, Hongying Jian, Kaixue Tang, Xianqin Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. BcWRKY33A Enhances Resistance toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Penghua GaoFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture, Kunming, 650205, China.
Hao ZhangFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture, Kunming, 650205, China.
Huijun YanFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture, Kunming, 650205, China.
Qigang WangFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture, Kunming, 650205, China.
Bo YanSouthwest Forestry University, Kunming, 650024, China.
Hongying JianFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture, Kunming, 650205, China.
Kaixue TangFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture, Kunming, 650205, China. kxtang@hotmail.com.
Xianqin QiuFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture, Kunming, 650205, China. xianqin711@hotmail.com.
Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNSouthwest Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRose is an important economic crop in horticulture. However, its field growth and postharvest quality are negatively affected by grey mould disease caused by Botrytis c. However, it is unclear how rose plants defend themselves against this fungal pathogen. Here, we used transcriptomic, metabolomic and VIGS analyses to explore the mechanism of resistance to Botrytis c.

resultIn this study, a protein activity analysis revealed a significant increase in defence enzyme activities in infected plants. RNA-Seq of plants infected for 0 h, 36 h, 60 h and 72 h produced a total of 54 GB of clean reads. Among these reads, 3990, 5995 and 8683 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found in CK vs. T36, CK vs. T60 and CK vs. T72, respectively. Gene annotation and cluster analysis of the DEGs revealed a variety of defence responses to Botrytis c. infection, including resistance (R) proteins, MAPK cascade reactions, plant hormone signal transduction pathways, plant-pathogen interaction pathways, Ca

conclusionFifty-four GB of clean reads were generated through RNA-Seq. R proteins, ROS signalling, Ca

Indexed as

BotrytisChinaDisease ResistanceGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGlucosinolatesHorticultureHost-Pathogen InteractionsMetabolomePlant ImmunityReproducibility of ResultsRosaTranscriptomeGlucosinolatesFungus–plant interactionsMAPK signalling pathway-plantMetabolomePlant hormone signal transductionResistance genesTranscriptomeVIGS

Identifiers

PMID34001006
PMCPMC8130329
OpenAlexW3162123533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.