Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34000909›Full record

ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2021

Serial memory for landmarks encountered during route navigation.

Christopher Hilton, Jan Wiener, Andrew Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher HiltonPsychology Department and Ageing & Dementia Research Centre, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-6935
Jan WienerPsychology Department and Ageing & Dementia Research Centre, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Andrew JohnsonPsychology Department and Ageing & Dementia Research Centre, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study demonstrates similarities between route learning and classical tests of serial order memory. Here, we investigated serial memory for landmarks in a route learning task, in younger and older adults. We analysed data from a route learning task with 12 landmarks. Participants (88 younger and 77 older) learned a route using either a Fixed Learning (3 exposures to the route) or Flexible Learning (repeated exposures until successful navigation was achieved) procedure. Following route learning, participants completed Immediate Free Recall (IFR) and Free Reconstruction of Order (Free RoO) of the landmarks. We show clear acquisition of sequence memory for landmarks for both age groups, with Free RoO producing a bowed serial position curve. IFR produced recency effects but no primacy effects in fixed learning, with recency reduced following flexible learning for both age groups. Younger adults displayed a primacy bias for the first item recalled in both learning conditions, as did the older adults in the flexible learning condition. In contrast, older adults displayed a recency bias in the fixed learning condition. Evidence of contiguity in IFR was present only for younger adults in the flexible learning condition. Findings are broadly consistent with results from typical short-term list learning procedures and support the universality of sequence learning effects, which we demonstrate are generalisable to a navigation context.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermMental RecallAgedHumansLearningSerial Learningageingnavigationroute learningsequence learningSerial memory

Identifiers

PMID34000909
PMCPMC8531950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.