Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34000901›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2021

'

Sonja McIlfatrick, Paul Slater, Olufikayo Bamidele, Deborah Muldrew, Esther Beck, Felicity Hasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Part of the solution: A survey of community organisation perspectives on barriers and facilitating actions to Advance Care Planning in British Columbia, Canada.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sonja McIlfatrickSchool of Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1010-4300
Paul SlaterSchool of Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland.
Olufikayo BamideleInstitute of Clinical and Applied Health Research, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Deborah MuldrewSchool of Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2845-1922
Esther BeckSchool of Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland.
Felicity HassonSchool of Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-9732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternationally, participation in advance care planning is low. Whilst a community action approach is advocated, what the public know and understand about advance care planning is unknown.

aimTo assess public awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards advance care planning and identify strategies to raise awareness within a public health framework.

designSequential mixed methods comprising a cross-sectional survey and focus group/interviews. SETTING/

participantsA random representative sample of adults from one region of the United Kingdom (

resultsMost participants (78.7%) acknowledged the benefits of advance care planning conversations, however, two thirds did not want to think about advance care planning or find out more at present. Respondents were reluctant to broach advance care planning as it was linked to end of life care and funeral plans, and they did not wish to cause distress to their loved one. Respondents trusted their family to respect their wishes and they considered having an advance care plan in place would be of assistance in the future. Top-down leadership, normalisation, and increased education were identified as potential approaches to overcome barriers.

conclusionsAdvance care planning was recognised as important despite limited awareness, lack of knowledge and misperceptions. Whilst a community action approach to enhance understanding and engagement was supported, a 'one size fits all' approach will not work; rather bespoke targeting is required with educational and media messaging aligned.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAdultAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSuperstitionsUnited KingdomAdvance care planningattitudesknowledgemixed methodspublic

Identifiers

PMID34000901
PMCPMC8267083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.