Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34000897›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2021

Assessment tools for problematic opioid use in palliative care: A scoping review.

Jenny Lau, Paolo Mazzotta, Rouhi Fazelzad, Suzanne Ryan, Alissa Tedesco, Andrew J Smith, Abhimanyu Sud, Andrea D Furlan, Camilla Zimmermann

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How Racialized Approaches to Opioid Use Disorder and Opioid Misuse Management Hamper Pharmacoequity for Cancer Pain.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The contribution of nonmedical opioid use to healthcare encounters for opioid overdose and use disorders among long-term users with metastatic cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jenny LauDivision of Palliative Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0947-7334
Paolo MazzottaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rouhi FazelzadUHN Library and Information Services, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Suzanne RyanDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alissa TedescoTemmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew J SmithAddictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abhimanyu SudDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrea D FurlanDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Camilla ZimmermannDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-0244

Funding

CIHR OCK_156774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening for problematic opioid use is increasingly recommended in patients receiving palliative care.

aimTo identify tools used to assess for the presence or risk of problematic opioid use in palliative care.

designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: Bibliographic databases (inception to January 31, 2020), reference lists, and grey literature were searched to find primary studies reporting on adults receiving palliative care and prescription opioids to manage symptoms from advanced cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, or end-stage organ diseases; and included tools to assess for problematic opioid use. There were no restrictions based on study design, location, or language.

resultsWe identified 42 observational studies (total 14,431 participants) published between 2009 and 2020 that used questionnaires (

conclusionGiven the dearth of studies using tools developed or validated specifically for patients receiving palliative care, further research is needed to inform clinical practice and policy regarding problematic opioid use in palliative care.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPainPalliative CareAnalgesics, OpioidAdultanalgesicsmass screeningopioid-related disordersopioidspalliative caresubstance abuse detectionsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34000897
PMCPMC8267087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.