ArticleContemporary clinical trials2021
Increasing diversity in research through dedicated language access services.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to (or how not to)…Enhance equity in the conduct of global health research: dimensions and directions for organizations.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Patient Attitudes and Perceived Barriers Toward Mental Health Treatment Options in a Rural Student-Run Clinic.Cureus · 2023Article
- Does race-ethnicity affect upper airway stimulation adherence and treatment outcome of obstructive sleep apnea?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of research, one challenge at higher education and medical institutions that are engaged in high levels of research activities is recruiting and enrolling participants for research studies and clinical trials (1) who are of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds and (2) whose primary language is not English. By 2020, of the 330 million people living in the U.S., 63% identified as White, 17% identified as Hispanic, 13% identified as Black, 5% identified as Asian, and 1% identified as other. With this shift in ethnic and racial demographics, researchers need to update their methods of recruitment as well as the information and documents provided about research opportunities. The University of Utah's Office Research Participant Advocacy (RPA) was created at the University of Utah in 2008 with an aim to identify and support individuals volunteering for research study participation. The focus of the important and uniquely situated office is to ensure that participants have the information they need for informed research participation, but also to provide researchers with oral and written language services to increase participant diversity in research studies. This short communication describes efforts underway at the RPA to ensure that information about and documents connected to research opportunities are congruent with the needs of research participants and offer equity for participation in research for a shifting cohort of diverse individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.