Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33999836›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Patient Empowerment During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Ensuring Safe and Fast Communication of Test Results: Implementation and Performance of a Tracking System.

Gunnar Völkel, Axel Fürstberger, Julian D Schwab, Silke D Werle, Nensi Ikonomi, Thomas Gscheidmeier, Johann M Kraus, Alexander Groß, Martin Holderried, Julien Balig and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient engagement and feasibility of a QR code-based digital information tool in the emergency department.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Gunnar Völkel *Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2696-5420
Axel Fürstberger *Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6907-9077
Julian D Schwab *Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3050-0618
Silke D Werle *Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5153-0269
Nensi Ikonomi *Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0780-5832
Thomas GscheidmeierDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2589-2450
Johann M KrausInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9534-6295
Alexander GroßInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5641-0680
Martin HolderriedDepartment of Medical Development and Quality Management, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1337-0516
Julien BaligInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9294-4399
Franz JobstUniversity Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0570-2370
Peter KuhnComprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5058-1059
Klaus A KuhnInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2575-8507
Oliver KohlbacherInstitute for Translational Bioinformatics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1739-4598
Udo X KaisersUniversity Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3781-0843
Thomas Seufferlein *Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3259-0810
Hans A Kestler *Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4759-5254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvercoming the COVID-19 crisis requires new ideas and strategies for online communication of personal medical information and patient empowerment. Rapid testing of a large number of subjects is essential for monitoring and delaying the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in order to mitigate the pandemic's consequences. People who do not know that they are infected may not stay in quarantine and, thus, risk infecting others. Unfortunately, the massive number of COVID-19 tests performed is challenging for both laboratories and the units that conduct throat swabs and communicate the results.

objectiveThe goal of this study was to reduce the communication burden for health care professionals. We developed a secure and easy-to-use tracking system to report COVID-19 test results online that is simple to understand for the tested subjects as soon as these results become available. Instead of personal calls, the system updates the status and the results of the tests automatically. This aims to reduce the delay when informing testees about their results and, consequently, to slow down the virus spread.

methodsThe application in this study draws on an existing tracking tool. With this open-source and browser-based online tracking system, we aim to minimize the time required to inform the tested person and the testing units (eg, hospitals or the public health care system). The system can be integrated into the clinical workflow with very modest effort and avoids excessive load to telephone hotlines.

resultsThe test statuses and results are published on a secured webpage, enabling regular status checks by patients; status checks are performed without the use of smartphones, which has some importance, as smartphone usage diminishes with age. Stress tests and statistics show the performance of our software. CTest is currently running at two university hospitals in Germany-University Hospital Ulm and University Hospital Tübingen-with thousands of tests being performed each week. Results show a mean number of 10 (SD 2.8) views per testee.

conclusionsCTest runs independently of existing infrastructures, aims at straightforward integration, and aims for the safe transmission of information. The system is easy to use for testees. QR (Quick Response) code links allow for quick access to the test results. The mean number of views per entry indicates a reduced amount of time for both health care professionals and testees. The system is quite generic and can be extended and adapted to other communication tasks.

Indexed as

CommunicationPandemicsPatient ParticipationCOVID-19GermanyHumansMedical InformaticsSARS-CoV-2Time Factorsclinical information systemCOVID-19data securityeHealthpatient empowermentplatform independentprocess optimizationquality managementtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33999836
PMCPMC8189287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.