Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33999835›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Multimodule Web-Based COVID-19 Anxiety and Stress Resilience Training (COAST): Single-Cohort Feasibility Study With First Responders.

Janna Marie Heyen, Noé Weigl, Mario Müller, Stefan Müller, Urs Eberle, Andrei Manoliu, Stefan Vetter, Adam D Brown, Thomas Berger, Birgit Kleim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Resilience enhancement interventions for disaster rescue workers: a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Helping Frontline Workers in Texas-A Framework for Resource Development.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Janna Marie HeyenDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8172-8903
Noé WeiglDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4891-1386
Mario MüllerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7071-3717
Stefan MüllerZurich Schutz und Rettung, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-5197
Urs EberleZurich Schutz und Rettung, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3663-0907
Andrei ManoliuDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-5752
Stefan VetterDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3063-0965
Adam D BrownDepartment of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-6061
Thomas BergerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-7791
Birgit KleimDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9114-2917
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of Bern · CHHarvard University · USNew School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the emergence of COVID-19, health care workers and first responders have been at a high risk for mental health symptoms owing to their exposure to the virus and increased work stress during the pandemic. Although interventions exist to address mental health issues following exposure to disasters, emergencies, and humanitarian crises, considerably less is known about web-based unguided interventions to help mitigate the negative impacts of such events. Additionally, in contexts in which emergencies reduce access to in-person care, remote forms of support are critical, yet there are limited studies on the use of such interventions. Evidence-based, easy-to-use, scalable interventions are direly needed for this population.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of an unguided electronic mental health program, COVID-19 Anxiety and Stress Resilience Training (COAST), tailored to first responders and health care personnel, based on scientific evidence and empirically based techniques.

methodsWe developed COVID-19-specific training modules focusing on several domains that are previously reported as key to resilience and stress recovery: self-efficacy, mindfulness, sleep quality, and positive thinking. The program was made available to 702 first responders between May and August 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sociodemographic, work-, and COVID-19-related information was collected, and psychometric questionnaires were completed. We examined user acceptance and user activity, including module choice and participant feedback.

resultsIn total, 52 of 702 (7%) first responders to whom we reached out used the program at least once. COAST use was independent of age, sex, or baseline levels of self-efficacy, mindful awareness, sleep quality, and positive thinking (for all, P>.39). First responders who had tested positive and those who had been quarantined were more likely to engage in the program. A click count analysis per module showed that participants used the self-efficacy and mindfulness modules most often, with 382 and 122 clicks, respectively, over 15 weeks. Overall, first responders expressed satisfaction with the program.

conclusionsEngagement of first responders in the multimodule web-based COAST program was feasible and the first responder cohort expressed overall satisfaction with the program. Those in more difficult circumstances, including those in quarantine and those who tested positive, may be more likely to engage in such programs. Further controlled studies could pave the way for efficacy studies and the development of additional modules, including just-in-time interventions or blended interventions combining individual use of an unguided self-help intervention, such as COAST, with subsequent individual psychotherapy for those who continue to experience stress and psychological symptoms.

Indexed as

anxietyCOVID-19electronic mental healthfeasibilityfirst respondermental healthmindfulnessresilienceself-efficacysleep qualitystresstraining

Identifiers

PMID33999835
PMCPMC8189283
OpenAlexW3156813660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.