ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2021
Transanal endoscopic surgery with a 3D printed device.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Application of FDM 3D Printing in Surgery and Traumatology: A Systematic Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Pooled it
- Development of a Pain Measurement Device Using 3D Printing and Electronic Air Pressure Control.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.BioMed research international · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of devices manufactured with 3D printing for performing transanal endoscopic procedures without pneumorectum.
methodsFunctional devices were designed in the Polytechnic School of Engineering of Gijón from 2016 to 2018 using three-dimensional (3D) solid modelling software (Solid-Works®), that allows customization of the device (diameter and length). The devices were made in acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) by additive manufacturing using an HP Designjet 3D Printer, with fused deposition modelling (FDM) technology. Tests were carried out on mixed simulators (with viscera) and cadavers with a prototype in the form of an open cylindrical base ellipsoid spindle with two bars. In this paper, we present the information of the first series of patients in which this device has been used to perform a full-thikness endoscopic resection of the rectal wall without pneumorectum. The characteristics of the patients, size, and location of the lesion, the type of anesthesia used, the duration of the procedure, hospital stay, complications, and pathology were analyzed. An endoscopic follow-up was also carried out for at least 2 years.
resultsSeven interventions were carried out in six patients. The lesions were located at a mean distance of 5 cm from the anal verge and an average area of 11.8 cm
conclusionsAn innovative device made with a 3D printer can be used successfully in transanal endoscopic resections of the rectal wall, with spinal anaesthesia and avoiding the need for pneumorectum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33999293What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.