Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33998998›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Understanding Barriers to Novel Data Linkages: Topic Modeling of the Results of the LifeInfo Survey.

Holly Clarke, Stephen Clark, Mark Birkin, Heather Iles-Smith, Adam Glaser, Michelle A Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holly ClarkeLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1975-5679
Stephen ClarkLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4090-6002
Mark BirkinLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5991-098X
Heather Iles-SmithLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0520-2694
Adam GlaserLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-5120
Michelle A MorrisLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-619X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel consumer and lifestyle data, such as those collected by supermarket loyalty cards or mobile phone exercise tracking apps, offer numerous benefits for researchers seeking to understand diet- and exercise-related risk factors for diseases. However, limited research has addressed public attitudes toward linking these data with individual health records for research purposes. Data linkage, combining data from multiple sources, provides the opportunity to enhance preexisting data sets to gain new insights.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to identify key barriers to data linkage and recommend safeguards and procedures that would encourage individuals to share such data for potential future research.

methodsThe LifeInfo Survey consulted the public on their attitudes toward sharing consumer and lifestyle data for research purposes. Where barriers to data sharing existed, participants provided unstructured survey responses detailing what would make them more likely to share data for linkage with their health records in the future. The topic modeling technique latent Dirichlet allocation was used to analyze these textual responses to uncover common thematic topics within the texts.

resultsParticipants provided responses related to sharing their store loyalty card data (n=2338) and health and fitness app data (n=1531). Key barriers to data sharing identified through topic modeling included data safety and security, personal privacy, requirements of further information, fear of data being accessed by others, problems with data accuracy, not understanding the reason for data linkage, and not using services that produce these data. We provide recommendations for addressing these issues to establish the best practice for future researchers interested in using these data.

conclusionsThis study formulates a large-scale consultation of public attitudes toward this kind of data linkage, which is an important first step in understanding and addressing barriers to participation in research using novel consumer and lifestyle data.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAttitudeHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPrivacySurveys and Questionnairesconsumer datadata linkagedata sharingfitness trackerlifestyle dataloyalty cardmHealthpublic attitudespublic opiniontext analysistopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID33998998
PMCPMC8167605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.