Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33998828›Full record

ArticleClinical nursing research2021

Comparison of Postoperative Pain Management Outcomes in the United States and China.

Hui Wang, Gwen D Sherwood, Shuang Liang, Zhiyi Gong, Liying Ren, Huaping Liu, Iat Kio Van

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nursing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hui WangKiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5749-6428
Gwen D SherwoodUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1529-6249
Shuang LiangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhiyi GongPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liying RenPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huaping LiuChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Iat Kio VanKiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNKiang Wu Nursing College of Macau · CNUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare pain management outcomes in postoperative patients from an American hospital and a Chinese hospital. A convenience sample of 244 patients in the United States and 268 patients in China with similar surgical sites completed the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised (APS-POQ-R) and the Pain Management Index (PMI) was calculated on their first postoperative day. Patients in the United States reported a higher score on the "perception of pain management" subscale of the APS-POQ-R and a higher proportion of adequate treatment as measured by the PMI (85.2% vs. 39.0%,

Indexed as

Pain ManagementPatient SatisfactionChinaHumansPostoperative PainPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAPS-POQ-Rpain managementpatient outcomespatient satisfactionpostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID33998828
PMCPMC8458668
OpenAlexW3160364650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.