Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33998330›Full record

ReviewPerspectives in public health2022

Efficacy of a county-wide schools weight management intervention.

G J Sanders, W L Marwa, B Wade, P Gately

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G J SandersCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Fairfax Hall Rm 230, Headingley Campus, Leeds LS6 3QS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6458-7312
W L MarwaCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
B WadeOneLife Suffolk, Inspire Suffolk, Ipswich, UK.
P GatelyCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Local Authority commissioned large-scale public health service that provided a 6-week school-based weight management intervention for children aged 4-19 years.

methodsA quantitative retrospective cohort study identified participants from 130 schools consisting of 8550 potential children aged 4-19 years across a mixture of Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) deprivation groups. Participants were invited to take part in a 5- to 12-week Healthy Lifestyles intervention with a focus on weight management delivered by OneLife Suffolk between 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2020. This resulted in a final sample of 5163 participants. The following information for each child was collected anonymously: (1) age, (2) gender, (3) preprogramme body mass index (BMI), (4) postprogramme BMI, (5) weight category and (6) LSOA category.

resultsFollowing the 6-week school-based intervention, there was a significant decrease in mean ΔBMI SDS (standardised body mass index) of -0.07 (-14.89%) among participants. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a significant change in weight status post 6-week weight management programme (WMP): BMI (

conclusionsThis study contributes to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of multicomponent school-based weight management interventions and demonstrates that such interventions can be successfully implemented as part of a wider healthy lifestyles service, without widening health inequalities.

Indexed as

Pediatric ObesityAnimalsBody Mass IndexChildHumansRetrospective StudiesSchool Health ServicesSchoolsSheepchildhoodinterventionobesitypreventionweight management

Identifiers

PMID33998330
PMCPMC9720709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.