Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33998253›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Risk Stratification of Patients With NonObstructive Coronary Artery Disease Using Resistive Reserve Ratio.

Takumi Toya, Ali Ahmad, Michel T Corban, Ilke Ӧzcan, Jaskanwal D Sara, Faten Sebaali, Javier Escaned, Lilach O Lerman, Amir Lerman

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Angiography-based coronary microvascular assessment with and without intracoronary pressure measurements: a systematic review.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Coronary Microvascular Disease in Contemporary Clinical Practice.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Prognostic value of structural and functional coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease; from the multicentre international ILIAS registry.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Takumi ToyaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.
Ali AhmadDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.
Michel T CorbanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.
Ilke ӦzcanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.
Jaskanwal D SaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.
Faten SebaaliDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.
Javier EscanedDepartment of Cardiology Hospital Clínico San Carlos Madrid Spain.
Lilach O LermanDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.
Amir LermanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · USHospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

Quantitative magnetization transfer MRI for evaluation of renal fibrosisR01DK122734 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LERMAN, LILACH O · 2020 to 2023
$2.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK122734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Resistive reserve ratio (RRR), or the ratio of baseline to hyperemic microvascular resistance, has prognostic implications in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. However, its value in patients with angina or ischemia with nonobstructive coronary artery disease is unknown. Methods and Results We included 1692 patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease who underwent invasive coronary vasoreactivity testing. Abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR, the ratio of hyperemic and baseline resting flow velocities) and RRR were defined as <2.5 and <2.62, respectively. The mortality rate was marginally higher in patients with abnormal CFR (428 patients [25%]) than those with normal CFR (38 [9%] versus 81 [6%];

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsEchocardiography, DopplerElectrocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansIncidenceMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentcoronary flow reservecoronary microvascular resistancenonobstructive coronary artery diseaseresistive reserve ratio

Identifiers

PMID33998253
PMCPMC8483554
OpenAlexW3163219329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.