Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33998087›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2021

Illegal drug market responses to state recreational cannabis laws.

Angélica Meinhofer, Adrian Rubli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Angélica MeinhoferDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6597-6755
Adrian RubliDepartment of Business Administration, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Cornell University · USInstituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México · MX

Funding

Utilization of health services after engagement with opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment provider by individuals with and without post-traumatic stress disorderP30DA040500 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Benjamin P. Linas · 2015 to 2026
$20.7M
Intergenerational effects of America's opioid crisis: Parental drug use and offspring healthK01DA051777 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MEINHOFER, ANGELICA · 2020 to 2025
$974k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA051777NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA040500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIn the United States, 15 states and the District of Columbia have implemented recreational cannabis laws (RCLs) legalizing recreational cannabis use. We aimed to estimate the association between RCLs and street prices, potency, quality and law enforcement seizures of illegal cannabis, methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, amphetamine and alprazolam.

designWe pooled crowdsourced data from 2010-19 Price of Weed and 2010-19 StreetRx, and administrative data from the 2006-19 System to Retrieve Information from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) and the 2007-19 National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS). We employed a difference-in-differences design that exploited the staggered implementation of RCLs to compare changes in outcomes between RCL and non-RCL states. SETTING AND CASES: Eleven RCL and 40 non-RCL US states. MEASURES: The primary outcome was the natural log of prices per gram, overall and by self-reported quality. The primary policy was an indicator of RCL implementation, defined using effective dates.

findingsThe street price of cannabis decreased by 9.2% [β = -0.092; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.15-, -0.03] in RCL states after RCL implementation, with largest declines among low-quality purchases (β = -0.195; 95% CI = -0.282, -0.108). Price declines were accompanied by a 93% (β = -0.93; 95% CI = -1.51, -0.36) reduction in law enforcement seizures of cannabis in RCL states. Among illegal opioids, including heroin, oxycodone and hydrocodone, street prices increased and law enforcement seizures decreased in RCL states.

conclusionsRecreational cannabis laws in US states appear to be associated with illegal drug market responses in those states, including reductions in the street price of cannabis. Changes in the street prices of illegal opioids analyzed may suggest that in states with recreational cannabis laws the markets for other illegal drugs are not independent of legal cannabis market regulation.

Indexed as

CannabisIllicit DrugsMarijuana AbuseHeroinHumansLegislation, DrugUnited StatesHeroinIllicit DrugsCannabis pricescocaineillegal drug marketslaw enforcementopioidsrecreational cannabis laws

Identifiers

PMID33998087
PMCPMC8578142
OpenAlexW3163082557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.