Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997971›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2021

Do nonpharmacological services offset opioids in pain treatment for soldiers?

Dominic Hodgkin, Rachel Sayko Adams, Grant Ritter, Sue Lee, Krista Beth Highland, Mary Jo Larson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dominic HodgkinInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4494-9176
Rachel Sayko AdamsInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4450-0712
Grant RitterInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Sue LeeDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Krista Beth HighlandDefense and Veterans Center for Integrative Pain Management, Department of Military & Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Mary Jo LarsonInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Brandeis University · USHarvard University · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

Trajectories of non-pharmacologic and opioid health services for pain management in association with military readiness and health status outcomes: SUPIC renewalR01AT008404 · NCCIH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI ADAMS, RACHEL SAYKO, LARSON, MARY JO · 2014 to 2023
$7.2M
First Longitudinal Study of Missed Treatment Opportunities Using DOD and VA DataR01DA030150 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LARSON, MARY JO · 2010 to 2013
$1.9M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008404NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the relationships between nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) utilization and opioid prescriptions and doses and whether these relationships vary according to the type of NPT service received. DATA SOURCE: Secondary data from the US Military Health System, nationwide. STUDY

designPatterns of NPT utilization and opioid prescriptions were analyzed over the 23 months after initial pain treatment (index visit). Regression models were used to examine the relationship between opioid prescription use in a given month and NPT service utilization in the three preceding months, using person fixed effects to control for time-invariant patient characteristics, as well as time fixed effects. Analyses were stratified by whether the patient filled an opioid prescription in the first 30 days post index visit. DATA EXTRACTION

methodsAdministrative data on health care utilization were extracted from the US Military Health System Data Repository for Army service members who returned from deployments in Afghanistan and Iraq that ended in fiscal years 2008 to 2014 and had at least one outpatient visit with a primary diagnosis of musculoskeletal pain in the subsequent year. PRINCIPAL

findingsUtilization of any NPT service in the past 3 months was positively associated with filling an opioid prescription in the given month, regardless of whether the patient was initially prescribed opioids (percentage point difference [PP] =2.87, P < 0.01) or not (PP = 0.83, P < 0.01). However, for those not initially prescribed opioids, use of any NPT service in the past 3 months was negatively associated with mean daily opioid dose in the given month (morphine milligram equivalent dose = -0.4017, P < 0.01). For those initially prescribed opioids, NPT was not associated with opioid dose.

conclusionsNPT only reduced the prescription opioid daily dose for some patients, whereas the probability of receiving an opioid prescription was positively associated with NPT. Future research should assess whether recent system-level policies and program changes influence referral and opioid prescribing patterns.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidComplementary TherapiesExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMilitary PersonnelMusculoskeletal PainAnalgesics, Opioidcomplementary therapiesmilitary healthmusculoskeletal painnonpharmacological treatmentopioid analgesicsprescriptions

Identifiers

PMID33997971
PMCPMC8586474
OpenAlexW3162059813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.