Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997943›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2021

The effect of targeting Tie2 on hemorrhagic shock-induced renal perfusion disturbances in rats.

Anoek L I van Leeuwen, Nicole A M Dekker, Paul Van Slyke, Esther de Groot, Marc G Vervloet, Joris J T H Roelofs, Matijs van Meurs, Charissa E van den Brom

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Rationale for the Use of Norepinephrine after the Control of Bleeding in Hemorrhagic Shock?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anoek L I van LeeuwenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Experimental Laboratory for Vital Signs, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole A M DekkerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Experimental Laboratory for Vital Signs, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul Van SlykeVasomune Therapeutics, Toronto, Canada.
Esther de GrootDepartment of Anesthesiology, Experimental Laboratory for Vital Signs, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc G VervloetDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joris J T H RoelofsDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Matijs van MeursDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, Medical Biology Section, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Charissa E van den BromDepartment of Anesthesiology, Experimental Laboratory for Vital Signs, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.vandenbrom@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-1388
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

CSL Behring Foundation for Research and Advancement of Patient Health Prof Heimburger AwardDutch Research Council Veni 2019Dutch society of anesthesiology Young Investigator Grant 2017European Society of Anaesthesiology Research project grant 2016European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Levi-Montalcini Award 2017Hartstichting 2016T064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemorrhagic shock is associated with acute kidney injury and increased mortality. Targeting the endothelial angiopoietin/Tie2 system, which regulates endothelial permeability, previously reduced hemorrhagic shock-induced vascular leakage. We hypothesized that as a consequence of vascular leakage, renal perfusion and function is impaired and that activating Tie2 restores renal perfusion and function.

methodsRats underwent 1 h of hemorrhagic shock and were treated with either vasculotide or PBS as control, followed by fluid resuscitation for 4 h. Microcirculatory perfusion was measured in the renal cortex and cremaster muscle using contrast echography and intravital microscopy, respectively. Changes in the angiopoietin/Tie2 system and renal injury markers were measured in plasma and on protein and mRNA level in renal tissue. Renal edema formation was determined by wet/dry weight ratios and renal structure by histological analysis.

resultsHemorrhagic shock significantly decreased renal perfusion (240 ± 138 to 51 ± 40, p < 0.0001) and cremaster perfusion (12 ± 2 to 5 ± 2 perfused vessels, p < 0.0001) compared to baseline values. Fluid resuscitation partially restored both perfusion parameters, but both remained below baseline values (renal perfusion 120 ± 58, p = 0.08, cremaster perfusion 7 ± 2 perfused vessels, p < 0.0001 compared to baseline). Hemorrhagic shock increased circulating angiopoietin-1 (p < 0.0001), angiopoietin-2 (p < 0.0001) and soluble Tie2 (p = 0.05), of which angiopoietin-2 elevation was associated with renal edema formation (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001). Hemorrhagic shock induced renal injury, as assessed by increased levels of plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL: p < 0.05), kidney injury marker-1 (KIM-1; p < 0.01) and creatinine (p < 0.05). Vasculotide did not improve renal perfusion (p > 0.9 at all time points) or reduce renal injury (NGAL p = 0.26, KIM-1 p = 0.78, creatinine p > 0.9, renal edema p = 0.08), but temporarily improved cremaster perfusion at 3 h following start of fluid resuscitation compared to untreated rats (resuscitation + 3 h: 11 ± 3 vs 8 ± 3 perfused vessels, p < 0.05).

conclusionHemorrhagic shock-induced renal impairment cannot be restored by standard fluid resuscitation, nor by activation of Tie2. Future treatment strategies should focus on reducing angiopoietin-2 levels or on activating Tie2 via an alternative strategy.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryContrast-enhanced ultrasonographyEndotheliumHemorrhageMicrocirculatory perfusionVascular leakage

Identifiers

PMID33997943
PMCPMC8126531
OpenAlexW3161758258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.