SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2022
Differences in lymphoma patients between chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy trials and the general population.
Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term response to autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer gene therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Emerging healthcare interventions: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's programmatic initiative.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023Review
- Outcomes of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and influence of chimaeric antigen receptor T trial eligibility criteria in second line-A population-based study of 736 patients.British journal of haematology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies appear to be promising treatments for non-Hodgkin's and B-cell lymphoma. However, several CAR-T therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration have only been tested for efficacy in relatively few single-arm clinical trials with small sample sizes. We sought to examine the differences between patients in these trials and the general population of patients with non-Hodgkin's and B-cell lymphoma. Five hundred and twenty-two patients from 15 CAR-T trials found in a systematic review and 417,492 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database were compared. CAR-T study participants appeared to be younger (46.7% under 70 years old vs. 42.2%), more male (68.0% vs. 55.7%), and followed for a shorter period of time compared to patients in the SEER population (mean [M] 45.6 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.7 to 63.3 months follow-up vs. M 57.1 months, 95% CI 57.0 to 57.3 months survival). CAR-T study participants may differ significantly from the general population of patients with non-Hodgkin's and B-cell lymphoma. Effectiveness of CAR-T therapies in the general population of lymphoma patients may differ from effectiveness demonstrated in trials. Newly created CAR-T patient registries are essential to establishing population-level effectiveness of the therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.