Does robotic-assisted thymectomy have advantages over video-assisted thymectomy in short-term outcomes? A systematic view and meta-analysis.

objectivesA thymic epithelial tumour is the most common primary tumour in the anterior mediastinum of adults. A few retrospective studies compared the short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted thymectomy (RAT) and video-assisted thymectomy (VAT). So, it is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis to further compare these 2 surgical techniques.

methodsEMBASE, Medline and Web of Science were used. Thesaurus terms and medical subject headings were used in Medline and EMBASE, respectively. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for grading because the included studies were all case-control studies.

resultsNine studies were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 723 patients, including 315 patients in the RAT group and 408 patients in the VAT group. The meta-analysis [odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.94; P = 0.041], indicating that RAT yielded a significantly lower rate of conversion compared with VAT. Duration of drainage with RAT was significantly less than that with VAT (weighted mean difference = -1.10; 95% CI -1.98 to -0.22; P = 0.014). The pooled analysis (weighted mean difference = -103.6; 95% CI -199.21 to -7.98; P = 0.034) suggested that patients in the RAT group had less drainage than those in the VAT group. The recurrence rates in both groups were comparable (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.03-1.20; P = 0.078).

conclusionsRAT has advantages over VAT in terms of short-term outcomes such as shorter duration of drainage, less total drainage and a lower rate of conversion. The recurrence rate was comparable between the 2 techniques. Therefore, RAT could be considered as an alternative treatment for diseases of the thymus.