ArticleCerebral cortex communications2021
High-Frequency Visual Stimulation Primes Gamma Oscillations for Visually Evoked Phase Reset and Enhances Spatial Acuity.
Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid and cumulative adult plasticity in the mouse visual cortex.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Article
- Chronic Monocular Deprivation Reveals MMP9-Dependent and -Independent Aspects of Murine Visual System Plasticity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Unveiling Visual Physiology and Steady-State Evoked Potentials using Low-Cost and Transferable Electroencephalography for Evaluating Neuronal Activation.International journal of psychological researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The temporal frequency of sensory stimulation is a decisive factor in the plasticity of perceptual detection thresholds. However, surprisingly little is known about how distinct temporal parameters of sensory input differentially recruit activity of neuronal circuits in sensory cortices. Here we demonstrate that brief repetitive visual stimulation induces long-term plasticity of visual responses revealed 24 h after stimulation and that the location and generalization of visual response plasticity is determined by the temporal frequency of the visual stimulation. Brief repetitive low-frequency stimulation (2 Hz) is sufficient to induce a visual response potentiation that is expressed exclusively in visual cortex layer 4 and in response to a familiar stimulus. In contrast, brief, repetitive high-frequency stimulation (HFS, 20 Hz) is sufficient to induce a visual response potentiation that is expressed in all cortical layers and transfers to novel stimuli. HFS induces a long-term suppression of the activity of fast-spiking interneurons and primes ongoing gamma oscillatory rhythms for phase reset by subsequent visual stimulation. This novel form of generalized visual response enhancement induced by HFS is paralleled by an increase in visual acuity, measured as improved performance in a visual detection task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.