Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997769›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in biotechnology2019

DNA damage measurements within tissue samples with Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD).

Kevin J Lee, Elise Mann, Luciana Madeira da Silva, Jennifer Scalici, Natalie R Gassman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Acute Heat Exposure Upregulates Zebra Finch Physiology While Avoiding DNA Damage Across Both Sexes.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel Techniques for Mapping DNA Damage and Repair in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin J LeeUniversity of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL 36688 USA.
Elise MannUniversity of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL 36688 USA.
Luciana Madeira da SilvaUniversity of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL 36688 USA.
Jennifer ScaliciUniversity of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL 36604, USA.
Natalie R GassmanUniversity of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL 36688 USA.
University of South Alabama · USUSA Mitchell Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Co-detection of DNA adducts and methylation sites as predictive biomarkers for exposuresR21ES028015 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA · PI EBENSTEIN, YUVAL, GASSMAN, NATALIE ROSE · 2017 to 2018
$389k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES028015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposures to genotoxic carcinogens and reactive species result in strand breaks and a spectrum of covalent modifications to DNA that can induce mutations and contribute to the initiation and progression of cancer. Measurements of DNA damage within tissue or tumor samples can serve as a biomarker for exposures or assess changes in DNA repair capacity relevant in cancer development and treatment. Numerous methods to characterize DNA damage exist. However, these methods are primarily applicable to isolated DNA or cultured cells, often require a substantial amount of material, and may be limited to the detection and quantification of only a handful of DNA adducts. Here, we used the Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD) assay to detect and excise DNA adducts using a cocktail of DNA repair enzymes, then the damage site within the genome are tagged for detection using a modified nucleotide. We previously demonstrated the RADD assay can detect lesions within isolated DNA and fixed cells, and now RADD can be used to detect DNA adducts and DNA strand breaks in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. We verified the ability of the RADD assay to detect DNA damage in tissue by exogenously inducing DNA damage with X-rays and restriction enzymes. We also showed that RADD can be multiplexed with antibodies to detect cell cycle markers or other proteins of interest. Finally, we showed that RADD can detect DNA damage within clinically relevant ovarian tumor samples. RADD is a flexible and easy-to-use assay that allows relative damage levels to be determined within FFPE samples and allows the heterogeneity of DNA adducts and strand breaks within clinically relevant samples to be measured.

Identifiers

PMID33997769
PMCPMC8118132
OpenAlexW2988010028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.