Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997763›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2021

Improving Neurosurgery Education Using Social Media Case-Based Discussions: A Pilot Study.

Nicola Newall, Brandon G Smith, Oliver Burton, Aswin Chari, Angelos G Kolias, Peter J Hutchinson, Alexander Alamri, Chris Uff, Brainbook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola NewallSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Brandon G SmithDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital & University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Oliver BurtonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.
Aswin ChariDepartment of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Angelos G KoliasDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital & University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter J HutchinsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital & University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alexander AlamriDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Chris UffDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Brainbook
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing shift toward a more generalized medical undergraduate curriculum has led to limited exposure to subspecialties, including neurosurgery. The lack of standardized teaching may result in insufficient coverage of core learning outcomes. Social media (SoMe) in medical education are becoming an increasingly accepted and popular way for students to meet learning objectives outside formal medical school teaching. We delivered a series of case-based discussions (CbDs) over SoMe to attempt to meet core learning needs in neurosurgery and determine whether SoMe-based CbDs were an acceptable method of education.

methodsTwitter was used as a medium to host 9 CbDs pertaining to common neurosurgical conditions in practice. A sequence of informative and interactive tweets were formulated before live CbDs and tweeted in progressive order. Demographic data and participant feedback were collected.

resultsA total of 277 participants were recorded across 9 CbDs, with 654,584 impressions generated. Feedback responses were received from 135 participants (48.7%). Participants indicated an increase of 77% in their level of knowledge after participating. Of participants, 57% (

conclusionsSoMe has been shown to be a favorable and feasible medium to host live, text-based interactive CbDs. SoMe is a useful tool for teaching undergraduate neurosurgery and is easily translatable to all domains of medicine and surgery.

Indexed as

BrainbookCbD, Case-based discussionCES, Cauda equina syndromeCM, Cervical myelopathyCOVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019EDH, Extradural hematomaGBM, GlioblastomaHCP, HydrocephalusLMICs, Low- and middle-income countriesMedical educationNeurosurgeryPublic engagementSAH, Subarachnoid hemorrhageScience disseminationSDH, Subdural hematomaSocial mediaSoMe, Social mediaTBI-CM, Traumatic brain injury–clinical managementTBI-P, Traumatic brain injury–pathophysiologyTBI, Traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID33997763
PMCPMC8095172
OpenAlexW3149890733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.