ReviewiScience2021
How context changes the neural basis of perception and language.
Review in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Categorization is 'baked' into the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Narrative context shifts gaze from visual to semantic salience.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- The cognitive science of language diversity: achievements and challenges.Cognitive processing · 2025Review
- The N400 component reflecting semantic and repetition priming of visual scenes is suppressed during the attentional blink.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Emergence of Emotion Selectivity in Deep Neural Networks Trained to Recognize Visual Objects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Emergence of Emotion Selectivity in Deep Neural Networks Trained to Recognize Visual Objects.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Predictive processing of scenes and objects.Nature reviews psychology · 2024Article
- Testing cognitive theories with multivariate pattern analysis of neuroimaging data.Nature human behaviour · 2023Review
- A large-scale fMRI dataset for human action recognition.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Enhancing learning and retention with distinctive virtual reality environments and mental context reinstatement.NPJ science of learning · 2022Article
- Similar mechanisms of temporary bindings for identity and location of objects in healthy ageing: an eye-tracking study with naturalistic scenes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive processes-from basic sensory analysis to language understanding-are typically contextualized. While the importance of considering context for understanding cognition has long been recognized in psychology and philosophy, it has not yet had much impact on cognitive neuroscience research, where cognition is often studied in decontextualized paradigms. Here, we present examples of recent studies showing that context changes the neural basis of diverse cognitive processes, including perception, attention, memory, and language. Within the domains of perception and language, we review neuroimaging results showing that context interacts with stimulus processing, changes activity in classical perception and language regions, and recruits additional brain regions that contribute crucially to naturalistic perception and language. We discuss how contextualized cognitive neuroscience will allow for discovering new principles of the mind and brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.