Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997656›Full record

ArticleJournal for the measurement of physical behaviour2020

Alternative Wear-time Estimation Methods Compared to Traditional Diary Logs for Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Accelerometers in Pregnant Women.

Samantha F Ehrlich, Amanda J Casteel, Scott E Crouter, Paul R Hibbing, Monique M Hedderson, Susan D Brown, Maren Galarce, Dawn P Coe, David R Bassett, Assiamira Ferrara

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha F EhrlichDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California and The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Amanda J CasteelThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Scott E CrouterThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Paul R HibbingThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Monique M HeddersonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Susan D BrownDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Maren GalarceDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Dawn P CoeThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
David R BassettThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Assiamira FerraraDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Early Life Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Child Growth, Adiposity, and NeurodevelopmentUH3OD023289 · OD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ASSIAMIRA FERRARA, Monique Marie Hedderson · 2018 to 2026
$25.1M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Appropriate Gestational Weight Gain in Overweight/Obese WomenR01HD073572 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FERRARA, ASSIAMIRA · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
Physical Activity in Pregnancy for Intergenerational Obesity PreventionK01DK105106 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI EHRLICH, SAMANTHA F · 2015 to 2021
$782k
Engaging At-Risk Minority Women in Health System Diabetes Prevention ProgramsK01DK099404 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BROWN, SUSAN DENISE · 2014 to 2017
$643k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073572NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK099404NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK105106NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIH HHS UH3 OD023289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to compare three sensor-based wear-time estimation methods to conventional diaries for ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers worn on the non-dominant wrist in early pregnancy.

methodsPregnant women (n= 108) wore ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers for 7 days and recorded their device on and off times in a diary (criterion). Average daily wear-time estimates from the Troiano and Choi algorithms and the wGT3X-BT accelerometer wear sensor were compared against the diary. The Hibbing 2-regression model was used to estimate time spent in activity (during periods of device wear) for each method. Wear-time and time spent in activity were compared with multiple repeated measures ANOVAs. Bland Altman plots assessed agreement between methods.

resultsCompared to the diary [825.5 minutes (795.1, 856.0)], the Choi [843.0 (95% CI 812.6, 873.5)] and Troiano [839.1 (808.7, 869.6)] algorithms slightly overestimated wear-time, whereas the sensor [774.4 (743.9, 804.9)] underestimated it, although only the sensor differed significantly from the diary (

conclusionsThe Choi or Troiano algorithms offer a valid and efficient alternative to diaries for the estimation daily wear-time in larger-scale studies of MVPA during pregnancy, and reduce burden for study participants and research staff.

Indexed as

ActiGraph accelerometerspregnancywear-timewrist-worn

Identifiers

PMID33997656
PMCPMC8121263
OpenAlexW3013152263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.