Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997635›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2021

Patient Work and Treatment Burden in Type 2 Diabetes: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla, Valentina Serrano, Catherine Gao, Manuel Sanchez, Katherine Carroll, Michael R Gionfriddo, Emma M Behnken, Ian Hargraves, Kasey Boehmer, Carl May and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Treatment burden and health-related quality of life in young adults with type 1 diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Review
  18. Shared decision-making as a method of care.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Gabriela Spencer-BonillaDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Valentina SerranoDepartment of Nutrition, Diabetes and Metabolism, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Catherine GaoKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Manuel SanchezKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Katherine CarrollSchool of Sociology, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Michael R GionfriddoCenter for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA.
Emma M BehnkenKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Ian HargravesKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kasey BoehmerKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Carl MayFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Victor M MontoriKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USAustralian National University · AUCenter for Innovation · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMayo Clinic in Arizona · USPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLStanford University · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SDM4Afib)R01HL131535 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MONTORI, VICTOR MANUEL · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesTL1TR000137 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR002972NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000137NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use quantitative and qualitative methods to characterize the work patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) enact and explore the interactions between illness, treatment, and life. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this mixed-methods, descriptive study, adult patients with T2DM seen at the outpatient diabetes clinic at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from February 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017, were invited to participate. The study had 3 phases. In phase 1, the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS) scale was used to quantify treatment burden. In phase 2, a convenience sample of patients used a smartphone application to describe, in real time, time spent completing diabetes self-management tasks and to upload descriptive digital photographs. In phase 3, these data were explored in qualitative interviews that were analyed by 2 investigators using deductive analysis.

resultsOf 162 participants recruited, 160 returned the survey (phase 1); of the 50 participants who used the smartphone application (phase 2), we interviewed 17 (phase 3). The areas in which patients reported highest treatment burden were difficulty with negotiating health services (eg, coordinating medical appointments), medical expenses, and mental/physical exhaustion with self-care. Participants reported that medical appointments required about 2.5 hours per day, and completing administrative tasks related to health care required about 45 minutes. Time spent on health behaviors varied widely-from 2 to 60 minutes in a given 3-hour period. Patients' experience of a task's burden did not always correlate with the time spent on that task.

conclusionThe most burdensome tasks to patients with T2DM included negotiating health care services, affording medications, and completing administrative tasks even though they were not the most time-consuming activities. To be minimally disruptive, diabetes care should minimize the delegation of administrative tasks to patients.

Indexed as

CuCoM, cumulative complexity modelHbA1c, hemoglobin A1cPETS, Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-managementT2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID33997635
PMCPMC8105508
OpenAlexW3155234210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.