Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997633›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2021

Clinician Care Team Composition and Health Care Utilization.

Matthew E Bernard, Susan B Laabs, Darshan Nagaraju, Summer V Allen, Michael P Halasy, David R Rushlow, Gregory M Garrison, Julie A Maxson, Marc R Matthews, Gerald J Sobolik and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew E BernardDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Susan B LaabsDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Darshan NagarajuDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Summer V AllenDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Michael P HalasySpine Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
David R RushlowDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Gregory M GarrisonDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Julie A MaxsonDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Marc R MatthewsDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Gerald J SobolikDepartment of Health Care Administration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Michelle A LampmanDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Randy M FossDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Steven L RosasDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Tom D ThacherDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that a greater proportion of physician time on primary care teams are associated with decreased emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, and readmissions, and to determine clinician and care team characteristics associated with greater utilization. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed administrative data collected from January 1 to December 31, 2017, of 420 family medicine clinicians (253 physicians, 167 nurse practitioners/physician assistants [NP/PAs]) with patient panels in an integrated health system in 59 Midwestern communities serving rural and urban areas in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa. These clinicians cared for 419,581 patients through 110 care teams, with varying numbers of physicians and NP/PAs. Primary outcome measures were rates of ED visits, hospitalizations, and readmissions.

resultsThe proportion of physician full-time equivalents on the team was unrelated to rates of ED visits (rate ratio [RR] = 0.826; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.624 to 1.063), hospitalizations (RR = 0.894; 95% CI, 0.746 to 1.072), or readmissions (RR = -0.026; 95% CI, 0.364 to 0.312). In separate multivariable models adjusted for clinician and practice-level characteristics, the rate of ED visits was positively associated with mean panel hierarchical condition category (HCC) score, urban vs rural setting, NP/PA vs physician, and lower years in practice. The rate of inpatient admissions was associated with HCC score, and 30-day hospital readmissions were positively associated with HCC score, lower years in practice, and male clinicians.

conclusionCare team physician and NP/PA composition was not independently related to utilization. More complex panels had higher rates of ED visits, hospitalization, and readmissions. Statistically significant differences between physician and NP/PA panels were only evident for ED visits.

Indexed as

ED, emergency departmentFTE, full-time equivalentHCC, hierarchical condition categoryNP, nurse practitionerPA, physician assistantRUCA, rural-urban community area

Identifiers

PMID33997633
PMCPMC8105520
OpenAlexW3156963781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.