Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997608›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology

Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus eyes with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

Sepehr Feizi, Mohammad Ali Javadi, Seyed-Mohamadmehdi Moshtaghion, Mohammad Abolhosseini

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis: A Systematic Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sepehr FeiziOphthalmic Research Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Boostan 9 Street, Pasdaran Avenue, Tehran 16666, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4457-8077
Mohammad Ali JavadiOphthalmic Research Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed-Mohamadmehdi MoshtaghionOphthalmic Research Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad AbolhosseiniOphthalmic Research Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study is to compare outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) against deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).

methodsKeratoconic patients with VKC who received PK (

resultsThe follow-up period was 59.4 ± 44.1 and 62.4 ± 38.9 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (

conclusionThe results indicate no difference in outcomes between PK and DALK for keratoconus in patients with VKC. Postoperative VKC reactivation increased the rate of suture-related problems after both techniques of keratoplasty.

Indexed as

deep anterior lamellar keratoplastykeratoconuspenetrating keratoplastyvernal keratoconjunctivitis

Identifiers

PMID33997608
PMCPMC8111270
OpenAlexW3158398840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.