ArticleOTO open
A Blinded Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Needle Gauges for Fine-Needle Biopsy of Thyroid Nodules.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Critical assessment of the comparison of needle gauges for fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes and thyroid.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Needle size for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology. A single institution experience.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Analysis of the influencing factors on fine-needle aspiration biopsy results of the thyroid.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare diagnostic capability and patient pain between 25-gauge (25G) and 27G needles for ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of thyroid nodules. STUDY
designProspective blinded randomized trial.
settingThyroid clinic in otolaryngology practice in a community.
methodsA prospective randomized blinded trial was conducted on 148 thyroid nodules in 107 patients undergoing ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy. Needle gauge was randomized to individual nodule. Patients were blinded to the needle size used. All specimens were assessed via the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology and assigned a morphologic quantitative score based on number of thyroid cells and lymphocytes, amount of colloid, and degree of blood/fibrin artifact in each sample. Patient pain experience was scored. A chi-square test was used to compare nondiagnostic rates, and differences in cytologic morphology and pain scores were compared with 2-sample Student
resultsOf the 148 nodules, 77 were biopsied with 25G needles and 71 with 27G needles. Twenty-five percent (19/77) of the samples obtained with 25G needles yielded a nondiagnostic cytology result (Bethesda category 1) as compared with 11% (8/70) in the 27G group (
conclusionUse of a 27G needle for fine-needle biopsies is not only safe and feasible but desirable and highly recommended, as it yields better diagnostic information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.