ReviewCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2020
Computational modeling for cardiovascular tissue engineering: the importance of including cell behavior in growth and remodeling algorithms.
Review in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomimetic electrospun scaffolds for engineered heart tissue: from design parameters to drug testing platforms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- V-Cornea: A computational model of corneal epithelium homeostasis, injury, and recovery.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Multiscale Kinematic Growth Coupled With Mechanosensitive Systems Biology in Open-Source Software.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2025Article
- Computational methods for biofabrication in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine - a literature review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Unraveling the complexity of vascular tone regulation: a multiscale computational approach to integrating chemo-mechano-biological pathways with cardiovascular biomechanics.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2024Article
- Strategies for Development of Synthetic Heart Valve Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.Progress in materials science · 2023Article
- Lifelike Transformative Materials for Biohybrid Implants: Inspired by Nature, Driven by Technology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Designing Biocompatible Tissue Engineered Heart Valves In Situ: JACC Review Topic of the Week.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Combining Cell Technologies With Biomimetic Tissue Engineering Applications: A New Paradigm for Translational Cardiovascular Therapies.Stem cells translational medicine · 2023Review
- In vivo development of tissue engineered vascular grafts: a fluid-solid-growth model.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2022Article
- 3D Tissue-Engineered Vascular Drug Screening Platforms: Promise and Considerations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Computational model of damage-induced growth in soft biological tissues considering the mechanobiology of healing.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2021Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding cardiovascular growth and remodeling (G&R) is fundamental for designing robust cardiovascular tissue engineering strategies, which enable synthetic or biological scaffolds to transform into healthy living tissues after implantation. Computational modeling, particularly when integrated with experimental research, is key for advancing our understanding, predicting the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.