Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997484›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Deep Learning-Based Fluence Map Prediction for Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost.

Wentao Wang, Yang Sheng, Manisha Palta, Brian Czito, Christopher Willett, Martin Hito, Fang-Fang Yin, Qiuwen Wu, Yaorong Ge, Q Jackie Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Advances in Automated Treatment Planning.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wentao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Yang ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Manisha PaltaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Brian CzitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Christopher WillettDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Martin HitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Fang-Fang YinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Qiuwen WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Yaorong GeDepartment of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Q Jackie WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment planning for pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a challenging task, especially with simultaneous integrated boost treatment approaches. We propose a deep learning (DL) framework to accurately predict fluence maps from patient anatomy and directly generate intensity modulated radiation therapy plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The framework employs 2 convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to sequentially generate beam dose prediction and fluence map prediction, creating a deliverable 9-beam intensity modulated radiation therapy plan. Within the beam dose prediction CNN, axial slices of combined structure contour masks are used to predict 3-dimensional (3D) beam doses for each beam. Each 3D beam dose is projected along its beam's-eye-view to form a 2D beam dose map, which is subsequently used by the fluence map prediction CNN to predict its fluence map. Finally, the 9 predicted fluence maps are imported into the treatment planning system to finalize the plan by leaf sequencing and dose calculation. One hundred patients receiving pancreas SBRT were retrospectively collected for this study. Benchmark plans with unified simultaneous integrated boost prescription (25/33 Gy) were manually optimized for each case. The data set was split into 80/20 cases for training and testing. We evaluated the proposed DL framework by assessing both the fluence maps and the final predicted plans. Further, clinical acceptability of the plans was evaluated by a physician specializing in gastrointestinal cancer.

resultsThe DL-based planning was, on average, completed in under 2 minutes. In testing, the predicted plans achieved similar dose distribution compared with the benchmark plans (-1.5% deviation for planning target volume 33 V

conclusionsThe DL framework can effectively plan pancreas SBRT cases within 2 minutes. The predicted plans are clinically deliverable, with plan quality approaching that of manual planning.

Identifiers

PMID33997484
PMCPMC8099762
OpenAlexW3130820622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.