Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997471›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2021

Bilateral calcification of the optic nerve sheath: A diagnostic dilemma.

Yngvil Solheim Husum, Karoline Skogen, Petter Brandal, Pål Andre Rønning, Andreas Reidar Wigers, Johan Arild Evang, Øystein Kalsnes Jørstad

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optic nerve and choroidal calcification in pediatric neurofibromatosis type 2.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yngvil Solheim HusumDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Karoline SkogenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Petter BrandalDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Pål Andre RønningDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Andreas Reidar WigersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Johan Arild EvangSection of Specialized Endocrinology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Øystein Kalsnes JørstadDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present a case of symptomatic optic nerve sheath calcification and highlight clues and pitfalls for the final diagnosis: bilateral optic nerve sheath meningioma. OBSERVATIONS: A 48-year-old man presented with painless vision loss in his left eye and findings consistent with left optic nerve atrophy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) displayed thinning of the left optic nerve without contrast-enhancement or evidence of compressive lesions. A supplementary computed tomography angiography (CTA) exposed scattered dural calcification, which included the optic nerves. This was regarded as an incidental finding. The initial diagnosis was ischemic optic neuropathy. Over the next two years, the vision loss in the left eye progressed. A CT of the orbits revealed extensive calcification surrounding both optic nerves. A second MRI was unchanged in comparison to the first MRI. The diagnosis was changed to idiopathic duro-optic calcification. The vision in the left eye further declined over another two years. Consecutive optical coherence tomography measurements of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer suggested bilateral progressive thinning. A third MRI displayed progression of tubular contrast-enhancement surrounding the optic nerves. On the basis of this finding, the patient was finally diagnosed with a bilateral optic nerve sheath meningioma and received external beam radiotherapy. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE: It is crucial to differentiate an optic nerve sheath meningioma from idiopathic calcification of the optic nerve. In the present case the initial MRI did not detect optic nerve sheath abnormalities. To better demonstrate characteristic calcification, additional CT imaging should be considered when a bilateral optic nerve sheath meningioma is suspected.

Indexed as

Bilateral optic nerve sheath meningiomaIdiopathic duro-optic calcificationOptic nerve atrophyOptic nerve sheath calcification

Identifiers

PMID33997471
PMCPMC8102398
OpenAlexW3157243218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.