Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997376›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Acute glycemic and insulin response of Fossence™ alone, or when substituted or added to a carbohydrate challenge: A three-phase, acute, randomized, cross-over, double blind clinical trial.

Priyali Shah, Thomas Ms Wolever, Alexandra L Jenkins, Adish Ezatagha, Janice Campbell, Andreea Zurbau, Manish Jain, Manoj Gote, Anirban Bhaduri, Ashim Mullick

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03755232 (Determination of the Acute Glycemic and Insulinemic Response of FOSSENCE™ Alone, or When Substituted or Added to a Carbohydrate Challenge), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03755232 nacompletednot on this map

Determination of the Acute Glycemic and Insulinemic Response of FOSSENCE™ Alone, or When Substituted or Added to a Carbohydrate Challenge: A Three-phase, Acute, Randomized, Cross-over, Double Blind Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTATA CHEMICALS LTDRan2018 to 2019Enrolled25ConditionsDietary Modification, HealthyArmsscFOS, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Priyali ShahTata Chemicals Ltd-Innovation Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Thomas Ms WoleverINQUIS Clinical Research (formerly GI Labs), Canada.
Alexandra L JenkinsINQUIS Clinical Research (formerly GI Labs), Canada.
Adish EzataghaINQUIS Clinical Research (formerly GI Labs), Canada.
Janice CampbellINQUIS Clinical Research (formerly GI Labs), Canada.
Andreea ZurbauINQUIS Clinical Research (formerly GI Labs), Canada.
Manish JainTata Chemicals Ltd-Innovation Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Manoj GoteTata Chemicals Ltd-Innovation Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Anirban BhaduriTata Chemicals Ltd-Innovation Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ashim MullickTata Consumer Products Ltd (formerly at Tata Chemicals Ltd-Innovation Centre), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Glycemic Index Laboratories · CATata Chemicals (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short chain fructo-oligosaccharides (scFOS) are well-recognized prebiotic fibers. Fossence™ (FOSS) is a scFOS that has been produced from sucrose via a proprietary fermentation process and has not been tested for its digestibility or glucose/insulin response (GR and IR, respectively). The present randomized, controlled, cross-over study was conducted in 3 phases to explore GR and IR to ingestion of FOSS, when replaced by/added to available-carbohydrates (avCHO) among 25 healthy adults (40 ± 14years). In each phase GR and IR elicited by 3-4 test-meals were measured among the fasted recruited subjects. The interventional test meals were as follows: Phase-1, water alone or 10g FOSS or 10g Dextrose in 250ml water; Phase-2, 250ml water containing Dextrose:FOSS (g:g) in the content as 50:0 or 50:15 or 35:0 or 35:15; Phase-3 portions of white-bread (WB) containing avCHO:FOSS (g:g) in the content as 50:0 or 50:15 or 35:0 or 35:15. Blood samples (finger prick method) were collected at fasting and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after start of test meal ingestion. Plasma glucose and serum insulin were analyzed utilizing standard methods. The primary endpoint was differences in glucose IAUC. All subjects provided their written consent to participate in the study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03755232). The results demonstrated that FOSS, when consumed alone, showed no raise in glycaemia or insulinemia and was statistically equivalent to response of water alone. GR and IR elicited by dextrose:FOSS and WB:FOSS test-meals of Phase 2 and Phase 3, were statistically equivalent to the respective test-meals without FOSS. Result of the 3 phases support the hypothesis that FOSS is resistant to breakdown and is indigestible in the human small-intestine, and therefore can be classified as an unavailable carbohydrate that does not raise post prandial blood glucose or insulin. FOSS, being sweet to taste, may be an acceptable sugar replacer in beverages without compromising their taste and sensory qualities.

Indexed as

Glycemic responseInsulin responseNon-digestible carbohydratesPrebiotic fiberShort chain fructo-oligosaccharidesSugar substitute

Identifiers

PMID33997376
PMCPMC8102419
OpenAlexW3159794087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.