Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997347›Full record

ArticleAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2021

Kosar Gharib-Naseri, Juliano C P Dorigam, Kiran Doranalli, Natalie Morgan, Robert A Swick, Mingan Choct, Shu-Biao Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of the ProbioticVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Prospective Application of NanoencapsulatedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. The Effects of DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  11. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kosar Gharib-NaseriSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Juliano C P DorigamEvonik Nutrition & Care GmbH, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457 Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany.
Kiran DoranalliEvonik Nutrition & Care GmbH, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457 Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany.
Natalie MorganSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Robert A SwickSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Mingan ChoctUniversity of New England, Armidale 2351, Australia.
Shu-Biao WuSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to investigate the effect of

Indexed as

Bacillus amyloliquefaciensBacteria populationGrowth performanceGut functionNecrotic enteritisReduced protein diet

Identifiers

PMID33997347
PMCPMC8110864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.