Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997306›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2021

Sarcopenia and mortality in cancer: A meta-analysis.

Philip Chun-Ming Au, Hang-Long Li, Grace Koon-Yee Lee, Gloria Hoi-Yee Li, Marcus Chan, Bernard Man-Yung Cheung, Ian Chi-Kei Wong, Victor Ho-Fun Lee, James Mok, Benjamin Hon-Kei Yip and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenia in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. The Conjugated Bile Acids Profile Suggests a Novel Liver-Muscle Axis Associated With Sarcopenia in Chronic Liver Disease.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip Chun-Ming AuDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Hong Kong.
Hang-Long LiLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Grace Koon-Yee LeeDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Hong Kong.
Gloria Hoi-Yee LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Hong Kong.
Marcus ChanLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Bernard Man-Yung CheungDepartment of Medicine, Hong Kong.
Ian Chi-Kei WongDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Hong Kong.
Victor Ho-Fun LeeDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong.
James MokLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Benjamin Hon-Kei YipJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Kenneth King-Yip ChengDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Chih-Hsing WuDepartment of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ching-Lung CheungDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Hong Kong.
University of Hong Kong · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HKHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this meta-analysis is to comprehensively evaluate the effects of lean mass on all-cause mortality across different cancer types.

methodsThis is a meta-analysis. Cohort studies on lean mass and mortality published before December 20, 2017 were obtained by systematic search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Inclusion criteria were cohort studies reporting lean mass measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioimpedance analysis or computed tomography, and with all-cause mortality as the study outcome. Exclusion criteria were studies using muscle mass surrogates, anthropometric measurement of muscle, rate of change in muscle mass, and sarcopenia defined by composite criteria. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of low/reduced lean mass on cancer mortality were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis stratifying studies according to cancer type and measurement index was performed.

resultsAltogether 100 studies evaluated the association between lean mass and cancer mortality. The overall pooled HR on cancer mortality was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.24 to 1.59) for every standard deviation decrease in lean mass and 1.69 (95% CI, 1.56 to 1.83) for patients with sarcopenia (binary cutoffs). Overall mortality was also significantly associated with sarcopenia in across various cancer types, except for hematopoietic, breast, ovarian and endometrial, and prostate cancer.

conclusionsThe robust association of decreased lean mass with increased mortality further justified the importance of developing clinical guidelines for managing sarcopenia in cancer patients. Public health initiatives aiming at promoting awareness of muscle health in susceptible individuals are urgently needed.

Indexed as

CancerLean massSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID33997306
PMCPMC8088991
OpenAlexW3139914615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.