Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997275›Full record

ArticleAcademic pathology

Experience With Pretravel Testing for SARS-CoV-2 at an Academic Medical Center.

Katherine L Imborek, Matthew D Krasowski, Paul Natvig, Anna E Merrill, Daniel J Diekema, Bradley A Ford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Shifting Mindsets: The Impact of a Patient Portal on Functioning and Recovery in a Mental Health Setting.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine L ImborekDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-8992
Matthew D KrasowskiDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0856-8402
Paul NatvigDivision of Student Life, Student Health, University of Iowa, IA, USA.
Anna E MerrillDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, IA, USA.
Daniel J DiekemaDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, IA, USA.
Bradley A FordDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, IA, USA.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International travel has been a significant factor in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Many countries and airlines have implemented travel restrictions to limit the spread of the causative agent, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. A common requirement has been a negative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction performed by a clinical laboratory within 48 to 72 hours of departure. A more recent travel mandate for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 immunoglobulin M serology testing was instituted by the Chinese government on October 29, 2020. Pretravel testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 raises complications in terms of cost, turnaround time, and follow-up of positive results. In this report, we describe the experience of a multidisciplinary collaboration to develop a workflow for pretravel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunoglobulin M serology testing at an academic medical center. The workflow primarily involved self-payment by patients and preferred retrieval of results by the patient through the electronic health record patient portal (Epic MyChart). A total of 556 unique patients underwent pretravel reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing, with 13 (2.4%) having one or more positive results, a rate similar to that for reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing performed for other protocol-driven asymptomatic screening (eg, inpatient admissions, preprocedural) at our medical center. For 5 of 13 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction positive samples, the traveler had clinical history, prior reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction positive, and high cycle thresholds values on pretravel testing consistent with remote infection and minimal transmission risk. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 immunoglobulin M was performed on only 24 patients but resulted in 2 likely false positives. Overall, our experience at an academic medical center shows the challenge with pretravel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 testing.

Indexed as

antibodiescoronavirus disease 2019 nucleic acid testingimmunoglobulin Mpolymerase chain reactionserologysevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2

Identifiers

PMID33997275
PMCPMC8110896
OpenAlexW3157410123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.