Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33997147›Full record

ArticleBone reports2021

Detecting pathological features and predicting fracture risk from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images using deep learning.

Tomi Nissinen, Sanna Suoranta, Taavi Saavalainen, Reijo Sund, Ossi Hurskainen, Toni Rikkonen, Heikki Kröger, Timo Lähivaara, Sami P Väänänen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomi NissinenDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Sanna SuorantaDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, POB1777, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Taavi SaavalainenDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, POB1777, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Reijo SundInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, POB1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Ossi HurskainenDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, POB1777, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Toni RikkonenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, POB1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Heikki KrögerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, POB1777, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Timo LähivaaraDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Sami P VäänänenDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIKuopio University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard imaging method for diagnosing osteoporosis in clinical practice. The DXA images are commonly used to estimate a numerical value for bone mineral density (BMD), which decreases in osteoporosis. Low BMD is a known risk factor for osteoporotic fractures. In this study, we used deep learning to identify lumbar scoliosis and structural abnormalities that potentially affect BMD but are often neglected in lumbar spine DXA analysis. In addition, we tested the approach's ability to predict fractures using only DXA images. A dataset of 2949 images gathered by Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study was used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) for classification. The model was able to classify scoliosis with an AUC of 0.96 and structural abnormalities causing unreliable BMD measurement with an AUC of 0.91. It predicted fractures occurring within 5 years from the lumbar spine DXA scan with an AUC of 0.63, meeting the predictive performance of combined BMD measurements from the lumbar spine and hip. In an independent test set of 574 clinical patients, AUC for lumbar scoliosis was 0.93 and AUC for unreliable BMD measurements was 0.94. In each classification task, neural network visualizations indicated the model's predictive strategy. We conclude that deep learning could complement the well established DXA method for osteoporosis diagnostics by analyzing incidental findings and image reliability, and improve its predictive ability in the future.

Indexed as

Deep learningDegenerationDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryFracture riskLumbar spineScoliosisTrabecular bone score

Identifiers

PMID33997147
PMCPMC8102403
OpenAlexW3159819276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.