ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Fixation of Unstable Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- What is the optimal surgical treatment for Neer type IIB (IIC) distal clavicle fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Anatomical ligament reconstruction for Neer type IIB distal clavicular fractures using suture buttons without acromioclavicular joint fixation.JSES international · 2025Article
- Clinical and Radiological Outcome Assessment following Coracoclavicular Reconstruction with Endobutton and Fibertape for Neer's Type II Lateral End Clavicle Fracture: A Prospective Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Locked Cerclage Wiring for Distal Clavicle Fractures: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes in 11 Patients.Cureus · 2025Article
- Outcomes of arthroscopic assisted fixation of distal clavicle fractures using an adjustable button.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Article
- Treatment Strategies for Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Narrative Review.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2025Review
- Osteosynthesis using Scorpion plate for neer type V distal clavicle fracture.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Coracoclavicular fixation techniques for Neer IIb and "extralateral" fractures of the distal clavicle: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2024Review
- Successful management of a distal clavicular fracture using Titanium elastic nail (TEN) fixation.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Complications following arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular stabilization in patients with unstable lateral clavicle fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Atraumatic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Case Report Treated with Excision of the Distal Clavicle Margin and Button Slide System with Allograft Tendon Reinforcement at Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Joint.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Arthroscopically Assisted Coracoclavicular Fixation Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Unstable Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Comparative analysis of arthroscopic-assisted Tight-rope technique and clavicular hook plate fixation in the treatment of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Article
- Acromioclavicular Fracture-Dislocation Fixation Technique With Cerclages and Osteosutures: The "Invisible" Repair.Arthroscopy techniques · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical management of unstable distal clavicle fractures (DCFs) remains controversial. Traditional open techniques result in acceptable union rates but are fraught with complications. In response to these limitations, arthroscopic techniques have been developed; however, clinical outcome data are limited. PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to systematically evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic fixation of unstable DCFs. The secondary purpose was to characterize the overall complication rate, focusing on major complications and subsequent reoperations. STUDY
designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and included a search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. English-language studies between 2008 and 2019 that reported on outcomes of patients with DCFs who underwent operative fixation using an arthroscopic or arthroscopically assisted surgical technique were included. Data consisted of patient characteristics, fracture type, surgical technique, concomitant injuries, union rates, functional outcomes, and complications.
resultsA total of 15 studies consisting of 226 DCFs treated using an arthroscopically based technique were included in the systematic review. The majority of fractures were classified as Neer type II. Most (97%) of the fractures underwent arthroscopic fixation using a cortical button coracoclavicular stabilization surgical technique. Bony union was reported in 94.1% of the fractures. Good to excellent outcomes were recorded in most patients at the final follow-up. The Constant-Murley score was the most widely used functional outcome score; the pooled mean Constant score was 93.06 (95% CI, 91.48-94.64). Complications were reported in 14 of the 15 studies, and the overall complication rate was 27.4%. However, only 12% of these were considered major complications, and only 6% required a reoperation for hardware-related complications.
conclusionArthroscopic fixation of DCFs resulted in good functional outcomes with union rates comparable to those of traditional open techniques. While the overall complication profile was similar to that of other described techniques, there was a much lower incidence of major complications, including hardware-related complications and reoperations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.