ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021
Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Return to Sport Outcomes: Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction vs. Bankart Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Evidence-Based Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Labral Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Return to play and recovery metrics after arthroscopic Bankart repair with augmentations in rugby players.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Remplissage With Bankart Repair for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Reducing Anterior Humeral Head Displacement by Implanting Anchors in the Upper Region of Hill-Sachs Lesions.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Postoperative Variations in Shoulder Biomechanics and Kinematics in the Abduction and External Rotation Position After Remplissage With Bankart Repair for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Finite Element Analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Dynamic Anterior Stabilization with Hill-Sachs Remplissage Can be Employed in Skeletally Immature Patients-Operative Technique.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Return to play following operative management of anterior shoulder instability in overhead athletes-A systematic review.Shoulder & elbow · 2024Review
- Rehabilitation Protocol Variability Following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Remplissage for Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
- Remplissage reduced sense of apprehension and increased the rate of return to sports at preinjury level of elite overhead athletes with on-track anterior shoulder instability.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Psychological Factors That Affect Return to Sport After Surgical Intervention for Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Review
- Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Arthroscopic All-Inside Remplissage Technique With Knotless Tape Bridge for Hill-Sachs Lesions.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
- Current concepts in chronic traumatic anterior shoulder instability.EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
- Return to Preinjury-Level Sports After Arthroscopic Latarjet for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Professional Athletes.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Bankart Repair With or Without Concomitant Remplissage Results in Similar Shoulder Motion and Postoperative Outcomes in the Treatment of Shoulder Instability.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough Bankart repair with remplissage is commonly performed to treat anterior shoulder instability, there is limited information on specific outcomes or patients' fears regarding return to sports (RTS). PURPOSE: To study recurrence rates, pain, shoulder function, active range of motion (ROM), RTS rate, and patients' fears and expectations for RTS after arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage for anterior shoulder instability. We compared these outcomes with those after Bankart repair alone. STUDY
designCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was carried out between 2007 and 2017 among patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (group BR) and Bankart repair alone (group B). At the final follow-up, outcomes including recurrence, pain, shoulder function, active ROM, RTS rate, and fear toward RTS were assessed. The specific outcomes for RTS were evaluated based on 3 levels: return to normal life, RTS at any level (RTSA), and RTS at previous level (RTSP).
resultsA total of 70 patients were included (29 in group BR and 41 in group B) with a mean 67.2 months of follow-up. Group BR demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate than did group B (0 vs 22.0%, respectively;
conclusionIn this study, recurrence rate, pain, shoulder function, active ROM, and RTS rate were satisfactory after arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage. Patients who underwent this procedure reported less fear toward RTS and higher rates of RTSA and RTSP than did those who undergo Bankart repair alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.