ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Clinical Relevance of Tubular Breast Carcinoma: Large Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes of rare pure histological subtypes of breast cancer in a tertiary single-center retrospective cohort.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in special types of breast cancer with non-favorable histology.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Rare Histological Types of Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.The breast journal · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of 22 Cases of Tubular Breast Carcinoma.The breast journal · 2025Article
- Is Surgical Excision of Focal Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Warranted? Experience at a Tertiary Care Center.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Pure Tubular Breast Carcinoma: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes.European journal of breast health · 2023Article
- Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: The Possibility to Omit Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.