Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33996344›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021

Automated Segmental Analysis of Fully Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow Maps by First-Pass Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Matthew Jacobs, Mitchel Benovoy, Lin-Ching Chang, David Corcoran, Colin Berry, Andrew E Arai, Li-Yueh Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance expert consensus statement on quantitative myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High-resolution quantification of stress perfusion defects by cardiac magnetic resonance.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew JacobsNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4204-4699
Mitchel BenovoyCircle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, AB T2P 3T6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4552-6255
Lin-Ching ChangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7780-5742
David CorcoranBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.
Colin BerryBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-8636
Andrew E AraiNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-1466
Li-Yueh HsuNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-7290

Funding

Quantification of Myocardial PerfusionZIAHL006137 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI ARAI, ANDREW · 2011 to 2020
$9.4M
British Heart Foundation PG/17/25/32884Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HL006137Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First pass gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging allows fully quantitative pixel-wise myocardial blood flow (MBF) assessment, with proven diagnostic value for coronary artery disease. Segmental analysis requires manual segmentation of the myocardium. This work presents a fully automatic method of segmenting the left ventricular myocardium from MBF pixel maps, validated on a retrospective dataset of 247 clinical CMR perfusion studies, each including rest and stress images of three slice locations, performed on a 1.5T scanner. Pixel-wise MBF maps were segmented using an automated pipeline including region growing, edge detection, principal component analysis, and active contours to segment the myocardium, detect key landmarks, and divide the myocardium into sectors appropriate for analysis. Automated segmentation results were compared against a manually defined reference standard using three quantitative metrics: Dice coefficient, Cohen Kappa and myocardial border distance. Sector-wise average MBF and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) were compared using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman Plots. The proposed method segmented stress and rest MBF maps of 243 studies automatically. Automated and manual myocardial segmentation had an average (± standard deviation) Dice coefficient of 0.86 ± 0.06, Cohen Kappa of 0.86 ± 0.06, and Euclidian distances of 1.47 ± 0.73 mm and 1.02 ± 0.51 mm for the epicardial and endocardial border, respectively. Automated and manual sector-wise MBF and MPR values correlated with Pearson's coefficient of 0.97 and 0.92, respectively, while Bland-Altman analysis showed bias of 0.01 and 0.07 ml/g/min. The validated method has been integrated with our fully automated MBF pixel mapping pipeline to aid quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion CMR.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular magnetic resonanceimage segmentationmyocardial blood flowmyocardial perfusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID33996344
PMCPMC8117952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.