Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33996226›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Auto-detection of cervical collagen and elastin in Mueller matrix polarimetry microscopic images using K-NN and semantic segmentation classification.

Camilo Roa, V N Du Le, Mala Mahendroo, Ilyas Saytashev, Jessica C Ramella-Roman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Polarimetric Imaging for Robot Perception: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camilo RoaDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Arts, Sciences and Education, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
V N Du LeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33174, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4054-4200
Mala MahendrooDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA.
Ilyas SaytashevDepartment of Ophthalmology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 Street, Miami, FL 33199, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4213-1175
Jessica C Ramella-RomanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33174, USA.
Florida International University · USSouthwestern Medical Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose an approach for discriminating fibrillar collagen fibers from elastic fibers in the mouse cervix in Mueller matrix microscopy using convolutional neural networks (CNN) and K-nearest neighbor (K-NN) for classification. Second harmonic generation (SHG), two-photon excitation fluorescence (TPEF), and Mueller matrix polarimetry images of the mice cervix were collected with a self-validating Mueller matrix micro-mesoscope (SAMMM) system. The components and decompositions of each Mueller matrix were arranged as individual channels of information, forming one 3-D voxel per cervical slice. The classification algorithms analyzed each voxel and determined the amount of collagen and elastin, pixel by pixel, on each slice. SHG and TPEF were used as ground truths. To assess the accuracy of the results, mean-square error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity (SSIM) were used. Although the training and testing is limited to 11 and 5 cervical slices, respectively, MSE accuracy was above 85%, SNR was greater than 40 dB, and SSIM was larger than 90%.

Identifiers

PMID33996226
PMCPMC8086465
OpenAlexW3133530829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.