Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33996205›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Method for parametric imaging of attenuation by intravascular optical coherence tomography.

Sun Zheng, Yang Fei, Sun Jian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sun ZhengDepartment of Electronic and Communication Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, Hebei, China.
Yang FeiDepartment of Electronic and Communication Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, Hebei, China.
Sun JianDepartment of Radiology, Hebei University Affiliated Hospital, Baoding 071003, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter-based intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) is a powerful imaging modality for visualization of atherosclerosis with high resolution. Quantitative characterization of various tissue types by attenuation coefficient (AC) extraction has been proven to be a potentially significant application of OCT attenuation imaging. However, existing methods for AC extraction from OCT suffer from the challenge of variability in complex tissue types in IVOCT pullback data such as healthy vessel wall, mixed atherosclerotic plaques, plaques with a single component and stent struts, etc. This challenge leads to the ineffectiveness in the tissue differentiation by AC representation based on single scattering model of OCT signal. In this paper, we propose a novel method based on multiple scattering model for parametric imaging of optical attenuation by AC retrieval from IVOCT images conventionally acquired during cardiac catheterization. The OCT signal characterized by the AC is physically modeled by Monte Carlo simulation. Then, the pixel-wise AC retrieval is achieved by iteratively minimizing an error function regarding the modeled and measured backscattered signal. This method provides a general scheme for AC extraction from IVOCT without the premise of complete attenuation of the incident light through the imaging depths. Results of computer-simulated and clinical images demonstrate that the method can avoid overestimation at the end of the depth profile in comparison with the approaches based on the depth-resolved (DR) model. The energy error depth and structural similarity are improved by about 30% and 10% respectively compared with DR. It provides a useful way to differentiate and characterize arterial tissue types in IVOCT images.

Identifiers

PMID33996205
PMCPMC8086439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.