Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33996123›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Natural history collections recapitulate 200 years of faunal change.

Christine Ewers-Saucedo, Andreas Allspach, Christina Barilaro, Andreas Bick, Angelika Brandt, Dieter Fiege, Susanne Füting, Bernhard Hausdorf, Sarah Hayer, Martin Husemann and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Christine Ewers-SaucedoZoologisches Museum, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Hegewischstraße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1891-7901
Andreas AllspachSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christina BarilaroLandesmuseum Natur und Mensch Oldenburg, Damm 38-44, 26135 Oldenburg, Germany.
Andreas BickZoological Collections of the University of Rostock, Institute for Biological Sciences, General and Systematic Zoology, Universitätsplatz 2, 18055 Rostock, Germany.
Angelika BrandtSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Dieter FiegeSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Susanne FütingMuseum für Natur und Umwelt Lübeck, Musterbahn 8, 23552 Lübeck, Germany.
Bernhard HausdorfCentrum für Naturkunde (CeNak), Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1604-1689
Sarah HayerZoologisches Museum, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Hegewischstraße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Martin HusemannCentrum für Naturkunde (CeNak), Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Ulrich JogerStaatliches Naturhistorisches Museum, Pockelsstraße 10, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Claudia KamckeStaatliches Naturhistorisches Museum, Pockelsstraße 10, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Mathias KüsterMüritzeum, Zur Steinmole 1, 17192 Waren (Müritz), Germany.
Volker LohrmannÜbersee-Museum Bremen, Bahnhofsplatz 13, 28195 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0476-7041
Ines MartinDeutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund, Germany.
Peter MichalikZoologisches Museum der Universität Greifswald, Loitzer Straße 26, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2459-9153
Götz-Bodo ReinickeDeutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund, Germany.
Martin SchwentnerCentrum für Naturkunde (CeNak), Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Michael StillerÜbersee-Museum Bremen, Bahnhofsplatz 13, 28195 Bremen, Germany.
Dirk BrandisZoologisches Museum, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Hegewischstraße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changing species assemblages represent major challenges to ecosystems around the world. Retracing these changes is limited by our knowledge of past biodiversity. Natural history collections represent archives of biodiversity and are therefore an unparalleled source to study biodiversity changes. In the present study, we tested the value of natural history collections for reconstructing changes in the abundance and presence of species over time. In total, we scrutinized 17 080 quality-checked records for 242 epibenthic invertebrate species from the North and Baltic Seas collected throughout the last 200 years. Our approaches identified eight previously reported species introductions, 10 range expansions, six of which are new to science, as well as the long-term decline of 51 marine invertebrate species. The cross-validation of our results with published accounts of endangered species and neozoa of the area confirmed the results for two of the approaches for 49 to 55% of the identified species, and contradicted our results for 9 to 10%. The results based on relative record trends were less validated. We conclude that, with the proper approaches, natural history collections are an unmatched resource for recovering early species introductions and declines.

Indexed as

biodiversitycollectionsCrustaceaEchinodermatamarine invertebratesMollusca

Identifiers

PMID33996123
PMCPMC8059531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.