Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33996110›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2021

Development of the mental health cultural adaptation and contextualization for implementation (mhCACI) procedure: a systematic framework to prepare evidence-based psychological interventions for scaling.

Manaswi Sangraula, Brandon A Kohrt, Renasha Ghimire, Pragya Shrestha, Nagendra P Luitel, Edith Van't Hof, Katie Dawson, Mark J D Jordans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manaswi SangraulaTranscultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-7945
Brandon A KohrtTranscultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3829-4820
Renasha GhimireTranscultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Pragya ShresthaTranscultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nagendra P LuitelTranscultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Edith Van't HofDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Katie DawsonUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Mark J D JordansTranscultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-8039

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause of the high burden of untreated mental illness in humanitarian settings and low- and middle-income countries, scaling-up effective psychological interventions require a cultural adaptation process that is feasible and acceptable. Our adaptation process incorporates changes into both content and implementation strategies, with a focus on local understandings of distress and treatment mechanisms of action.

methodsBuilding upon the ecological validity model, we developed a 10-step process, the mental health Cultural Adaptation and Contextualization for Implementation (mhCACI) procedure, and piloted this approach in Nepal for Group Problem Management Plus (PM+), a task-sharing intervention, proven effective for adults with psychological distress in low-resource settings. Detailed documentation tools were used to ensure rigor and transparency during the adaptation process.

findingsThe mhCACI is a 10-step process: (1) identify mechanisms of action, (2) conduct a literature desk review for the culture and context, (3) conduct a training-of-trainers, (4) translate intervention materials, (5) conduct an expert read-through of the materials, (6) qualitative assessment of intervention population and site, (7) conduct practice rounds, (8) conduct an adaptation workshop with experts and implementers, (9) pilot test the training, supervision, and implementation, and (10) review through process evaluation. For Group PM+, key adaptations were harmonizing the mechanisms of action with cultural models of 'tension'; modification of recruitment procedures to assure fit; and development of a skills checklist.

conclusionA 10-step mhCACI process could feasibly be implemented in a humanitarian setting to rapidly prepare a psychological intervention for widespread implementation.

Indexed as

Cultural adaptationdeveloping countriesgroup interventionshumanitarian crisesmental healthpsychological distresstask-sharing

Identifiers

PMID33996110
PMCPMC8082944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.