Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33996080›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2021

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of health professionals in Ethiopia toward COVID-19 prevention at early phase.

Getahun Fetansa, Belachew Etana, Tadesse Tolossa, Melkamu Garuma, Tariku Tesfaye Bekuma, Bizuneh Wakuma, Werku Etafa, Ginenus Fekadu, Alemnesh Mosisa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Getahun FetansaDepartment of Nursing, Institutes of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-1050
Belachew EtanaDepartment of Public Health, Institutes of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Tadesse TolossaDepartment of Public Health, Institutes of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Melkamu GarumaNekemte Public Health Research and Referral Laboratory, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Tariku Tesfaye BekumaDepartment of Public Health, Institutes of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7390-1788
Bizuneh WakumaDepartment of Nursing, Institutes of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Werku EtafaDepartment of Nursing, Institutes of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9576-8888
Ginenus FekaduDepartment of pharmacy, Institutes of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-0685
Alemnesh MosisaDepartment of Nursing, Institutes of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Wollega University · ETChinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a potentially lethal disease having significant public health concerns. As the disease is new, nothing has been intervened yet. Therefore, here we show the health worker's knowledge, attitude, and practice toward COVID-19.

methodsThe online cross-sectional study design was conducted from April to May 2020, among Ethiopia health workers. The data were collected online, downloaded by an Excel sheet, and transferred to IBM SPSS version 24. Using questionnaire containing four parts sociodemographic, knowledge, attitude, and practice assessing. Linear logistic regression and binary logistic regression were performed to test the association between the dependent and the independent variables. We reported the 95% confidence intervals of adjusted odds ratios with a statistical significance level at less than 0.05 RESULTS AND

conclusionA total of 441 health workers were included in this study. The majority of participants were from urban (88.7%), nurses (53.1%), male (88.4%), and have a degree educational level (66.7%). The mean knowledge level of respondents was 10.13 ± 0.057 standard deviation. The majority of respondents had a positive attitude toward control of COVID-19, 88%, and 77% of respondents had confidence that Ethiopia will control COVID-19. Similarly, male (2.746, 95% confidence interval (1.23, 6.02)) and good knowledge level (1.98, 95% confidence interval (1.01, 3.09)) were found to be a determinant for attitude regarding control of COVID-19. Good knowledge level 1.6 (1.02, 2.6), male sex 2.2 (1.07, 4.6), masters 2.33 (1.06, 5.08), and medical doctors 5.99 (1.76, 20.4) to practice wearing a mask when going out of the home. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of the participant health workers are considerable, but may not be enough to control the disease. Sex, age, and profession of the health workers were determinant factors for knowledge about COVID-19. Therefore, training has to be considered for updating health care workers on COVID-19 prevention and controlled at the national level.

Indexed as

attitudeEthiopiahealth professionalsKnowledgepractice

Identifiers

PMID33996080
PMCPMC8083007
OpenAlexW3158070266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.