Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33996060›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021

Recurrent giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma: Review of literature and a rare case report.

Lalith Kanthala, Samrat Ray, Sri Aurobindo Prasad Das, S Nundy, N Mehta

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a rare case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lalith KanthalaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India.
Samrat RayDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India.
Sri Aurobindo Prasad DasDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India.
S NundyDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India.
N MehtaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India.
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and importanceRetroperitoneal liposarcomas (RPLS) are usually grow large with frequent recurrences. Complete surgical excision remains the gold standard treatment for primary and even recurrent tumours. Their prognosis depends on their histological type and grade. We report a recurrent giant de-differentiated RPLS weighing 18.55 kg which was completely excised. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest liposarcoma reported in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40 year old female presented with a gradually progressing large abdominal lump for 1year. She had had a similar large lump twice in the past and undergone excision of the tumour elsewhere. Firm non-tender mass felt all over abdomen with edema noted over abdominal wall and bilateral lower limbs. PET CT showed large heterogeneously enhancing mass occupying almost the entire abdominopelvic cavity. 50 × 40 × 40cm tumour was completely excised and biopsy showed grade 2 dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS). She is under close follow up with no recurrence at 12months. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: DDLS have lower risk of distant metastases but have a high risk of local recurrence. The most important favourable prognostic factor in these tumours is complete resection with negative margins. Because of the ineffectiveness of current chemotherapy and the requirement of intolerably high radiation doses, surgical excision remains the most effective treatment even for the localized recurrences of RPLS.

conclusionThe dedifferentiated subtype should be suspected in locally aggressive RPLS. Close follow up with early detection of recurrences and prompt excision with negative margins lowers the risk of recurrences and improves survival.

Indexed as

Case reportDe-differentiatedRecurrentRetroperitoneal liposarcomaSurgical excision

Identifiers

PMID33996060
PMCPMC8091881
OpenAlexW3153968928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.