ReviewJournal of tissue engineering
Breathing in vitro: Designs and applications of engineered lung models.
Review in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrathin Hydrogel Membranes Inspired by Soap Films Enable Physiologically Relevant Breathing Lung Models.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Acute Exposure to Combustible and Novel Tobacco Products Using an In Vitro Human Airway Organ Tissue Equivalent Model.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Article
- Decellularized Rat Lung Extracellular Matrix as an In Vitro Platform for Canine Yolk Sac-Derived Endothelial Precursor Cells for Pulmonary Endothelium Reconstruction Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of physiological strain on lung epithelial cells by exposure to aerosolised quartz silica in a perfused bioreactor.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Cyclic Strain and Macrophage-Mediated Transport Govern Micron-Sized PMAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Innovative engineering approaches to model host-microbiome interactions in vitro.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2025Review
- Cyclic mechanical loading of photopolymerized methacrylated hydrogels for probing interdependent effects of strain, stiffness, and substrate composition in pulmonary fibrogenesis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A 3D Model of the Human Lung Airway for Evaluating Permeability of Inhaled Drugs.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Dynamic mechanical stimulation of alveolar epithelial-fibroblast models using the Flexcell tension system to study of lung disease mechanisms.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): immunotoxicity at the primary sites of exposure.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2025Review
- Air-liquid interface exposure of A549 human lung cells to characterize the hazard potential of a gaseous bio-hybrid fuel blend.PloS one · 2024Article
- A multiplex inhalation platform to modelFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- An integratedInternational journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Application of Precision-Cut Lung Slices as an In Vitro Model for Research of Inflammatory Respiratory Diseases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Dynamic Fluid Flow Exacerbates the (Pro-)Inflammatory Effects of Aerosolised Engineered Nanomaterials In Vitro.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Lung Models to Evaluate Silver Nanoparticles' Toxicity and Their Impact on Human Health.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- 3D Lung-on-Chip Model Based on Biomimetically Microcurved Culture Membranes.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022Article
- Imaging-guided bioreactor for de-epithelialization and long-term cultivation ofLab on a chip · 2022Article
- Homogeneous Distribution of Exogenous Cells onto De-epithelialized Rat Trachea via Instillation of Cell-Loaded Hydrogel.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this review is to provide a systematic design guideline to users, particularly engineers interested in developing and deploying lung models, and biologists seeking to identify a suitable platform for conducting in vitro experiments involving pulmonary cells or tissues. We first discuss the state of the art on lung in vitro models, describing the most simplistic and traditional ones. Then, we analyze in further detail the more complex dynamic engineered systems that either provide mechanical cues, or allow for more predictive exposure studies, or in some cases even both. This is followed by a dedicated section on microchips of the lung. Lastly, we present a critical discussion of the different characteristics of each type of system and the criteria which may help researchers select the most appropriate technology according to their specific requirements. Readers are encouraged to refer to the tables accompanying the different sections where comprehensive and quantitative information on the operating parameters and performance of the different systems reported in the literature is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.