Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33995889›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2021

3D Printed Acetabular Components for Complex Revision Arthroplasty.

Angela Yao, Daniel Mark George, Vijai Ranawat, Chris John Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Effectiveness analysis of revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty assisted by artificial intelligence preoperative planning system].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela YaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville Rd, Woodville South, SA 5011 Australia.
Daniel Mark GeorgeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Repatriation General Hospital, Daws Rd, Daw Park, SA 5041 Australia.
Vijai RanawatDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hereford County Hospital, Stonebow Rd, Hereford, HR1 2BN UK.
Chris John WilsonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Repatriation General Hospital, Daws Rd, Daw Park, SA 5041 Australia.
Repatriation General Hospital · AUCounty Hospital · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown high early failure rates with Cup Cage constructs in complex revision surgery for Paprosky 3B acetabular defects. As a result, the use of 3D printed custom-made acetabular components has become more common. In this case series, we present two cases that demonstrate the latest advancement in 3D printed implants for severe acetabular bone loss. The follow up was 3 and 7 years. Neither patient has undergone revision surgery of the acetabular component to date. One patient sustained a femoral peri-prosthetic fracture requiring plate fixation. This case study demonstrates that 3D printed implants have excellent intraoperative and immediate postoperative outcomes in revision surgery for severe acetabular bone defects.

Indexed as

Acetabular defectsAcetabular implantsAcetabular replacementRevision surgery

Identifiers

PMID33995889
PMCPMC8081786
OpenAlexW3118683336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.